this is an update of Youth rating scaled based om FIFA ranking average since it started, with a different correlation for teams from Europe and South America compared to the other continents.
the current youth rating is not correct and far way from reality, this is best fit if you want your generated future players to be realistic
here is the difference between my top20 (based on FIFA ranking average over the years) and FM top20 teams rating , and you make the choice which one is more realstic
FM YOUTH RANKING (top20)
==================
1. Brazil 163p
2. Germany 155p
3. Russia 148p
4. Spain 145p
5. Italy 144p
6. France 140p
7. Argentina 140p
8. Egypt 138p
9. Tureky 124p
10. Netherland 122p
11. England 120p
12. Mexico 120p
13. Nigeria 120p
14. Colombia 117p
15. Portugal 114p
16. Japan 112p
17. Belgium 110p
18. South Korea 110p
19. USA 110p
20. Jordan 107p


MY FILE YOUTH RANKING (based on avg FIFA ranking) TOP20
====================================
1. Brazil 163p
2. Argentina 160p
3. Germany 158p
4. Spain 156p
5. Holland 152p
6. Italy 151p
7. France 148p
8. England 145p
9. Portugal 145
10. Czech 138p
11. Mexico 136p
12. Denmark 134p
13. Russia 133p
14.USA 131p
15. Sweden 130p
16. Colombia 129
17. Croatia 129p
18. Romania 128p
19. Uruguay 127p
20. Greece 126p

to install it, just add the file in your editor folder and make sure you tick it and you need to start a new game
normally is this folder, but replace xxx with your username
C:\Users\xxx\Documents\Sports Interactive\Football Manager 2016\editor data

cheers
shwan
Comments
Whomario
16 years ago
4 months ago
5
This is not at all a straightforward rating ... There are waaaay too many stars created as is, if anything the rating needs to be lowered (not raised) across the board and the reason that f.e. England is low originally is due to the fact that they have (and create) by far the best facilities and by far the highest average junior coaching/youth recruitment.
Shwan Chalabi
9 years ago
1 month ago
4
well pls update me on that , I think is just a case, please try it and come back to me
in theory, it shouldn't change alot, bcz i kept Hierarchy as I kept the top (Brazil) as it is , just relocated countries according to their avg ranking in FIFA
is average anyway for potential ability, not all players will reach their potential anyway
but sure if FM did ranked top one which was Brazil wrongly, am more than happy to reduce all skills down, i just didn't want to change top value bcz i trust FM had tested it over the years bcz tbh is same value since years
feche
14 years ago
3 months ago
1
Don't trust too much. We have fights every year for this and we're not happy with the currents ratings. Belgium and Uruguay should be higher and Russia, Mexico and USA should be lowered even more. Good work.
Shwan Chalabi
9 years ago
1 month ago
4
Don't trust too much. We have fights every year for this and we're not happy with the currents ratings. Belgium and Uruguay should be higher and Russia, Mexico and USA should be lowered even more. Good work.

agree this is why I wanted to find better solution to this unrealistic rating by SI
Problem, I can't be objective using my evaluation so i used FIFA ranking .. which is debatable but at least will rank countries according to their results
the only problem in FIFA ranking is fact that it didnt get the scale difference between continent right, this is why I give Europe and South america higher correlation , then Africa a different one, then rest of world, but agree, I may need to tune the difference even further

regarding Belgium and Uruguay argument, true, they are now better than Russia, but this is what is good about FIFA average ranking over past years, bcz it will take into account larger sample of time, there were moments Russia was better than Uruguay and Belgium were really below average side.. same happen to many countries, such as Bulgaria who reached world cup semi final and they had an amazing side
Sh4DoxXx
9 years ago
16 hours ago
46
I need to know, how i can fix this list on my own.. ?

You'll need to Login to comment