Martin O'Neill - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
2020273
Background and Stadium Packs
Submitted
26 Nov 2018 07:19:06
Timeline
This image is part of a pack:
Republic of Ireland EURO 2016 + Youth and Staff [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
UEFA Coaches [Old Request Response]
I think that the angle is much better on the 11.02 cut
@Lebohang Mokoena and @krissmed
I'll leave it up to @mons to decide if it is a improvement or not
. I just think the current ones hairline look a bit strange on a dark background that is all, otherwise there is nothing wrong with the current one in my opinion. I totally agree with the fact that the current one has a better angle. I think you must just accept the fact that sometimes deciding whether a image is a improvement or not is simply a matter of taste and personal preferences 
. So no worries and perhaps this is a improvement and perhaps it is not 
I see the point in posting if this was a request and you think it is not worth wasting time on cutting, but this is already cut. I think mons goes through all the improvement submissions anyway..... so whether he spends time on reading comments or just looking at the image when he is making updates must be the same. In my humble opinion I don't see why you would spend time on going through the "made" cuts unless there was some sort of trend and someone was making the same mistake over and over again. I just sometimes think that you scare potential cutters away with to much unnecessary criticism. Me I will just keep making cuts and sometimes I get it right and sometimes I don't
I'll leave it up to @mons to decide if it is a improvement or not
. I just think the current ones hairline look a bit strange on a dark background that is all, otherwise there is nothing wrong with the current one in my opinion. I totally agree with the fact that the current one has a better angle. I think you must just accept the fact that sometimes deciding whether a image is a improvement or not is simply a matter of taste and personal preferences . So no worries and perhaps this is a improvement and perhaps it is not I see the point in posting if this was a request and you think it is not worth wasting time on cutting, but this is already cut. I think mons goes through all the improvement submissions anyway..... so whether he spends time on reading comments or just looking at the image when he is making updates must be the same. In my humble opinion I don't see why you would spend time on going through the "made" cuts unless there was some sort of trend and someone was making the same mistake over and over again. I just sometimes think that you scare potential cutters away with to much unnecessary criticism. Me I will just keep making cuts and sometimes I get it right and sometimes I don't
It was only a question, not unnecessary criticism. If the current cut isn't good, I'd like to know what's wrong to made better cuts in the future, sorry if my question annoyed you.
@Lebohang Mokoena and @krissmed
I'll leave it up to @mons to decide if it is a improvement or not
I see the point in posting if this was a request and you think it is not worth wasting time on cutting, but this is already cut. I think mons goes through all the improvement submissions anyway..... so whether he spends time on reading comments or just looking at the image when he is making updates must be the same. In my humble opinion I don't see why you would spend time on going through the "made" cuts unless there was some sort of trend and someone was making the same mistake over and over again. I just sometimes think that you scare potential cutters away with to much unnecessary criticism. Me I will just keep making cuts and sometimes I get it right and sometimes I don't
I haven't had time to compare the images yet, so I can't specifically comment yet on whether it is an improvement or not, but the bit in bold is very true. If the source image had been posted as a request, I would probably have rejected it as the existing megapack cut is recent and fine, but since it's been cut, of course I will check it
With regards to the bit in italics, the overwhelming majority of improvements are included but there are some cases where the choice of source and/or quality of cut aren't good enough. Or maybe a cutter decides to provide a cut of inferior quality which is more recent, so I then have to assess whether to consider it as an improvement. Etc. etc. To avoid causing offence to cutters, I don't notify them all the time when this happens, but I don't think it's unfair for me to point out when cuts can be improved, especially when a cutter is still starting out.
Lebohang Mokoena