Win a copy of FM24 in our Prediction League. Prizes are given out to the best predictor each month, so you have multiple chances to win.


Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Slashman X | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 17:07 PM
Hodgson was at the game, he's smart enough to make his own appraisal of Carroll's performance

Hodgson's England teams have been pretty much picked off the back of hype and media pressure, so don't hold your breath.
Fantastic
13 years ago
1 month ago
2,496
Banned
I fucking hate West Ham. Mainly because far too many journalists are West Ham fans.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
2 days ago
3,323
By Ninja | Permalink | On 19 April 2013 - 00:11 AM
Hodgson's England teams have been pretty much picked off the back of hype and media pressure, so don't hold your breath.

Hence Ferdinand's call-up then, going by your argument.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Portaloo | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 17:25 PM
Hence Ferdinand's call-up then, going by your argument.

Yes. Obviously.

It was incredibly weak on Hodgsons part to call him back up.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
I watched the second half. West Ham seemed to be the better team and Carroll was about their best player. Seems justified. Made one absolutely excellent defensive clearance. I think he got an assist as well. Unlucky not to score with a great shot.

England should probably just pick Carroll anyway. He's probably the best in the world at what he does. Where not going to beat Spain or Germany at their game, so we should maybe try and play a different game.
Zog
17 years ago
5 years ago
395
By Ninja | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 17:02 PM
They will when he's back in the England team on the back of it.


And?

He deserves it, best target man we've got, better than just sticking with only Defoe, Sturridge, Welbeck or other random pacey English forward.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Shola | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 18:39 PM
I watched the second half. West Ham seemed to be the better team and Carroll was about their best player. Seems justified. Made one absolutely excellent defensive clearance. I think he got an assist as well. Unlucky not to score with a great shot.

England should probably just pick Carroll anyway. He's probably the best in the world at what he does. Where not going to beat Spain or Germany at their game, so we should maybe try and play a different game.


Hoofing the ball aimlessly at a target man has not worked for the past 60 years, why should it work now? And we're not going to beat Spain and Italy hoofing it either.

Carroll was crap in the second half as he was the first, his 'unlucky' shot was easily covered by De Gea, he was dominated in the air by Vidic and if Probert had anything about him he would have been off well before that. His defensive clearance was decent, but he shouldn't have been on the pitch at that point.

He won one key header, against Evra on the back post, is English football still so far in the stone ages that the fact he's close to 20cm taller than someone makes him a good player?

By Zog | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 19:01 PM
And?

He deserves it, best target man we've got, better than just sticking with only Defoe, Sturridge, Welbeck or other random pacey English forward.


Nah, he's a huge international liability. He never will get away with the stray elbows, thuggery and 'getting himself involved' that he does in the Premier League. A European ref would have had him off before the incident which he was actually booked for (which ironically, was the softest one of the lot), that's ignoring the fact that unless you play to the specific style that West Ham do he's a gigantic waste of space.

Do you really want players like Jack Wilshere hoofing the ball up the pitch for a caveman to win knockdowns? We've better players than that, we can play better football than that.

If we have to have a target man I'd much rather Lambert, not only because he's scored a ton more goals than Carroll but because he's actually showed under Pochettino that he has some technical ability.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Andy Carroll is a really, really good player
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Slashman X | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 19:34 PM
Andy Carroll is a really, really good player

Which is, of course, why he failed so badly at the only club he's been at that required more from him than being quite tall.
King Luis
17 years ago
3 months ago
3,111
Has Andy Carroll killed your cat or something Ninja, never known someone to be so bothered about a pissing MOTM award before
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By King Luis | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 19:44 PM
Has Andy Carroll killed your cat or something Ninja, never known someone to be so bothered about a pissing MOTM award before

Nah. I don't care about the motm it just serves a point to critique the ridiculous culture we have in England.

People will then wonder why we can't produce any technically gifted players and then applaud a performance so devoid of any technique because someone put themselves about a bit as if they're unrelated.
King Luis
17 years ago
3 months ago
3,111
No one ever pays attention to MOTM awards though, give it a week and no one will even be able to name who the MOTM was in any given game its such a nothing award most of the time.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By King Luis | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 19:58 PM
No one ever pays attention to MOTM awards though, give it a week and no one will even be able to name who the MOTM was in any given game its such a nothing award most of the time.


But the hype will remain. Which is the more the point.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
By Ninja | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 19:42 PM
Which is, of course, why he failed so badly at the only club he's been at that required more from him than being quite tall.

Loads of players fail at Liverpool, nothing special about that
King Luis
17 years ago
3 months ago
3,111
By Slashman X | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 20:35 PM
Loads of players fail at Liverpool, nothing special about that

Loads of players fail at a lot of clubs its hardly a Liverpool only thing.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Nah, no player has failed at any club other than Liverpool
Fantastic
13 years ago
1 month ago
2,496
Banned
A ridiculous amount of truth bombs being dropped in this thread.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
By Ninja | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 19:51 PM
Nah. I don't care about the motm it just serves a point to critique the ridiculous culture we have in England.

People will then wonder why we can't produce any technically gifted players and then applaud a performance so devoid of any technique because someone put themselves about a bit as if they're unrelated.


England has always produced technically gifted players. David Beckham is the most capped outfield player, a man with no pace or physical presence and all technical ability. Compared to our great rivals and overachievers, Germany who have Lothar Matthaus as their most capped player. Generally synonymous with boring technocratic football.

'Technically gifted' as a phrase is generally nonsense. It generally means passing and control, but only by a player who is already known to be a good passer. 'The difference between a long pass and a long ball is the passer'. And it totally excludes certain techniques as being technique. Andy Carroll's outstanding heading ability is disregarded because he's tall. Long range shooting is also disregarded for some reason.

Looking at the potential England team for 2014 if we qualify - our midfield is going to be completely outclassed by Germany and Spain. Therefore trying to match up on an even basis is almost certainly not going to work. England therefore must innovate and attempt to become for that the sum of their parts. One option I suppose is trying to get the ball to Carroll as I reckon Carroll would have the beating of Hummels/ Boateng/ Badstuber/ Mertesacker if we can play to his strengths.

'And Carroll failed at Liverpool because he was required to more than tall' - he didn't fail at Rodger's Liverpool, - he failed at Dalglish's - remember? Kenny 'hasn't adapted tactically in 20 years, hoof it to a target man, taking football backward' Dalglish.

'Carroll gets assist' - 'Doesn't count because he's tall.' So? Messi would be a much lesser player if he didn't have great pace. Or control, or finishing.

In regards to his thuggery that he wouldn't get away with in European competitions. Andy Carroll has never been booked in an international game. He's also received one career red card. - while playing for Preston when he was 18. Obviously a liability - unlike Rooney.

Oh and that challenge on De Gea looked totally accidental - as a genuine attempt for the ball. He lead with his head and seemingly made no attempt for self-preservation. A yellow card offense.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Shola | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 21:13 PM
1. England has always produced technically gifted players. David Beckham is the most capped outfield player, a man with no pace or physical presence and all technical ability. Compared to our great rivals and overachievers, Germany who have Lothar Matthaus as their most capped player. Generally synonymous with boring technocratic football.

'Technically gifted' as a phrase is generally nonsense. It generally means passing and control, but only by a player who is already known to be a good passer. 'The difference between a long pass and a long ball is the passer'. And it totally excludes certain techniques as being technique. Andy Carroll's outstanding heading ability is disregarded because he's tall. Long range shooting is also disregarded for some reason.

2. Looking at the potential England team for 2014 if we qualify - our midfield is going to be completely outclassed by Germany and Spain. Therefore trying to match up on an even basis is almost certainly not going to work. England therefore must innovate and attempt to become for that the sum of their parts. One option I suppose is trying to get the ball to Carroll as I reckon Carroll would have the beating of Hummels/ Boateng/ Badstuber/ Mertesacker if we can play to his strengths.

3. 'And Carroll failed at Liverpool because he was required to more than tall' - he didn't fail at Rodger's Liverpool, - he failed at Dalglish's - remember? Kenny 'hasn't adapted tactically in 20 years, hoof it to a target man, taking football backward' Dalglish.

4. 'Carroll gets assist' - 'Doesn't count because he's tall.' So? Messi would be a much lesser player if he didn't have great pace. Or control, or finishing.

5. In regards to his thuggery that he wouldn't get away with in European competitions. Andy Carroll has never been booked in an international game. He's also received one career red card. - while playing for Preston when he was 18. Obviously a liability - unlike Rooney.

6. Oh and that challenge on De Gea looked totally accidental - as a genuine attempt for the ball. He lead with his head and seemingly made no attempt for self-preservation. A yellow card offense.

1. No, you know exactly what I mean when I say 'technically gifted' players whose physique does not dictate what type of player they are, whose ability is why they are at the top level, players who are intelligent in possession, comfortable on the ball, not players who happen to have been 6ft 3in and can't play in a team that's not geared to hitting the ball onto their head.

Let's not quibble over a definition that we all understand just because it serves your purpose. England have, especially in recent years, produced players who work hard and have gotten to this level so far based on physique rather than technique, that you can count English players blessed with comparable technique to the worlds elite on one hand from the so called 'golden generation' is indicative of that.

2. Of course it is, they've got the best two midfields in the world. That doesn't mean you make up for a lack of quality by hoofing the ball, Stoke and West Ham are, after all, not suddenly in the Top 4 because they hoof it to a big lump to knock down, percentage football has its limits. It's hard to imagine a nation ever winning the world cup hoofing the ball anymore. It's too limited a game plan, it may be effective to secure mid table safety, at the top level it's a waste of players that are better than that, and against teams very good at keeping the ball it's just a opportunity for them to win the second ball and get possession straight back. It's not a coincidence that we're watching possibly the best team ever in Barcelona playing a very technical game, they utilise their players ability and get the best out of them they don't stifle it by reducing the game to percentages.

3. Of course, but Dalglish's team did try and play football. They had players like Suarez and required Carroll to be able to participate in a style that didn't involve pumping balls onto his head constantly from deep or from wide, and he was god awful. He showed that unless you play in a way that gets plenty of crosses into the box, and hits his head early from deep he's not a good player. That that was obvious is why Rodgers' has been so keen to sell him.

4. You've just compared Andy Carroll to Messi, think about that. It's a completely redundant point anyway, if you play a game specifically designed to use his aerial prowess of course he will create chances. That doesn't make him in some way a magnificent player, it's simple percentages of him getting up to win headers, it's exactly why percentage football works at all. (Besides, according to Whoscored stats he has a magnificent 1 assist this season, even including Liverpool and Newcastle stats he has 8 assists in 90 Premier League games).

5. Rooney is irrelevant to the discussion, as is too the fact that he hasn't been sent off before, my initial point was that he is allowed to play that way much more than he is in England than in European competition. He may not have received a yellow card in Internationals, he may know when to stop flinging elbows after being booked but you can't quibble the fact that physical play in general is frowned upon by European refs, if he put in that performance he did for West Ham last night in an England shirt he would have walked. That was the point.

6. You're kidding yourself, he was about 2 seconds late and made no attempt to do anything natural to slow himself down (if De Gea was a brick wall not a frail Spanish goal keeper who needed to be roughed up don't you think he might, just maybe have put his hands in front of him to lessen the force of impact?) he meant to flatten De Gea, it was at best a yellow card (which would have seen him dismissed anyway, given the further course of events), and at worst it was a red.

Also, I don't know why you 'keep putting things in quote marks randomly' but it's really annoying.

Anyway, I'm bored of arguing about Carroll. If Heskey wasn't the answer to all of England's problems neither is Carroll, just shows how desperate England are that Carroll is actually considered an international option to some.
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
I dont even care about this argument or Carroll, but go Shola
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
nonsense and doublespeak.
Zog
17 years ago
5 years ago
395
By Ninja | Permalink | On 18 April 2013 - 19:31 PM
Hoofing the ball aimlessly at a target man has not worked for the past 60 years, why should it work now? And we're not going to beat Spain and Italy hoofing it either.

Carroll was crap in the second half as he was the first, his 'unlucky' shot was easily covered by De Gea, he was dominated in the air by Vidic and if Probert had anything about him he would have been off well before that. His defensive clearance was decent, but he shouldn't have been on the pitch at that point.

He won one key header, against Evra on the back post, is English football still so far in the stone ages that the fact he's close to 20cm taller than someone makes him a good player?

Nah, he's a huge international liability. He never will get away with the stray elbows, thuggery and 'getting himself involved' that he does in the Premier League. A European ref would have had him off before the incident which he was actually booked for (which ironically, was the softest one of the lot), that's ignoring the fact that unless you play to the specific style that West Ham do he's a gigantic waste of space.

Do you really want players like Jack Wilshere hoofing the ball up the pitch for a caveman to win knockdowns? We've better players than that, we can play better football than that.

If we have to have a target man I'd much rather Lambert, not only because he's scored a ton more goals than Carroll but because he's actually showed under Pochettino that he has some technical ability.




Andy Carroll is fb.

England are a pretty shit team, we can't convince ourselves that we're going to be able to pass teams to death. We've got pretty good crossers and there isn't a better player in the air who is English, I'm not saying start him by any means but he's an effective plan B and useful for certain matches.

He's barely had a proper run in the first team since his Newcastle days where most people seem to forget that he was leading the line very well for a fair good Newcastle team at 20 years old. Lambert's had a good season but Carroll has shown much more potential than him and is already established in the set up, I can't see why you wouldn't want him in the team. Ridiculous to claim he has no technical ability either, just not true at all.

You moan about English culture but I'd say you pretty much epitomise another part of what's wrong with English football, incredibly fickle fans. You write off a clealry talented youngster and just latch on to this seasons flavour of the week in Lambert just because he's banged in a few for Southampton. England actually need to build a team, Lambert will be on the scrapheap in a couple of years time along with the rest of the English one season wonders.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
2 days ago
5,082
Premium
A fully-fit Carroll who's playing regularly should be in the England squad. Always a good option to have and he's decent with his feet as well - much better than Heskey, anyway.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
2 days ago
3,323
You moan about English culture but I'd say you pretty much epitomise another part of what's wrong with English football, incredibly fickle fans. You write off a clealry talented youngster and just latch on to this seasons flavour of the week in Lambert just because he's banged in a few for Southampton. England actually need to build a team, Lambert will be on the scrapheap in a couple of years time along with the rest of the English one season wonders.

I think it's part of a more deep-rooted problem in English football, that your clubs don't have enough faith in local players.

Lambert (and Grant Holt last season) are relatively talented players, and with their form it's not ridiculous to say that they should be called up to the NT.
Problem is they both are in (or approaching) their 30s, and it's unrealistic to say that Hodgson can build a longterm team with them.

Thing is, the pair have been playing lower-league football for most of their careers (Holt played in Singapore ffs) and if a higher-profile club took a chance on them they could play a bigger part in the national setup.
ianbaker
12 years ago
7 years ago
762
Lets just give FIFA what they want and start playing long ball. Even make the Wembley pitch like Blackpool's pitch, rutted and nigh-on unplayable. Then at least FIFA will have some reason to hate us instead of it just being for nothing.
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
By Telegram Sam | Permalink | On 19 April 2013 - 12:35 PM
A fully-fit Carroll who's playing regularly should be in the England squad. Always a good option to have and he's decent with his feet as well - much better than Heskey, anyway.


I'd agree he should be in the squad, but he wouldn't be first choice and I certainly wouldn't be playing tactics from the beginning to suit/strength his size as a player. England have very good players coming through at the moment with Cleverley, Welbeck and Wilshere to name a few, if they're encouraged to play football then they could do some damage to bigger teams.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Carroll's challenge on De Gea was never a red card, he was clearly going for the ball.

Also I'm pretty sure the nudge from Vidic had a part to play
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Zog | Permalink | On 19 April 2013 - 03:08 AM


Andy Carroll is fb.

England are a pretty shit team, we can't convince ourselves that we're going to be able to pass teams to death. We've got pretty good crossers and there isn't a better player in the air who is English, I'm not saying start him by any means but he's an effective plan B and useful for certain matches.

He's barely had a proper run in the first team since his Newcastle days where most people seem to forget that he was leading the line very well for a fair good Newcastle team at 20 years old. Lambert's had a good season but Carroll has shown much more potential than him and is already established in the set up, I can't see why you wouldn't want him in the team. Ridiculous to claim he has no technical ability either, just not true at all.

You moan about English culture but I'd say you pretty much epitomise another part of what's wrong with English football, incredibly fickle fans. You write off a clealry talented youngster and just latch on to this seasons flavour of the week in Lambert just because he's banged in a few for Southampton. England actually need to build a team, Lambert will be on the scrapheap in a couple of years time along with the rest of the English one season wonders.

If that video is supposed to prove that he's more than a target man then you've lost me, standard goals you'd expect from a target man.

You missed me point, I don't want Lambert in the team hence the italicised 'have' and the discussion of why playing that style of football is going to get England no where, my point was merely that over the course of this season Lambert has shown more to deserve an England call up than Carroll has, and does seem to have a little more about him than Carroll, at least judging by recent form.

If Andy Carroll was not purchased for £35m in a fit of desperation by Liverpool or, dare I say it, was not English I fail to see anyone attributing any great potential to him that he hasn't shown yet. To give him his dues, he's still only 24 and its not beyond the realms of possibility he could thrive for a team outside of one that suits him to a tee like West Ham if he could adapt and improve but he's shown nothing so far to suggest he can.

Or just read this article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/west-ham/10004424/Andy-Carroll-proved-against-Manchester-United-that-he-belongs-to-bygone-age.html
Dutton
17 years ago
3 months ago
1,101
Doesnt matter even if he was going for the ball. If he went in that late and hard on someones leg it would have been a red card, so why is it not if you go in on someones head like that? I know whats worse and which could potentially cause more damage.
Number 1
16 years ago
11 months ago
3,650
PFA Player of the Year Noms: Bale, Carrick, Hazard, Mata, Suarez, Van Persie
PFA Young Player of the Year Noms: Bale, Benteke, Hazard, Lukaku, Welbeck, Wilshere

Bale for YPOTY, Suarez/RVP for POTY methinks.

Also what the fuck is Welbeck doing there?

You'll need to Login to comment