Sam
18 years ago
1 year ago
5,092
Dammit Smalling, should be 3. What a ball Kagawa.

Playing at a really high tempo and attacking through the middle. What's going on?
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
This is where you wish Kagawa had a pair of bollocks.

If he could do this when the chips are down we'd be 10x a better side.
SpinSwimScream
14 years ago
1 week ago
1,598
Januzaj has been brilliant too, his crossing has been really dangerous.
Sam
18 years ago
1 year ago
5,092
Kagawa should have scored, I think that showed his loss of confidence of late. He needs a goal.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
If Evra is injured and Coentrao is available for £12m, and wants to join and we still don't sign him I'll kill someone.
Sam
18 years ago
1 year ago
5,092
Swansea attack down our left and get into the area, Buttner doing well again then, man got past him so easily.

PLEASE can we get rid of him.
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
DZEKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
This is City's title to lose. A class above everyone else.

I guess that's what hundreds of millions of pounds gets you.
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Ahahahahahahahahaha. Absolute cracker disallowed
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
That is a ridiculous decision.
The Platypus
13 years ago
1 year ago
1,784
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
Absolutely scandalous decision.
Poe
18 years ago
1 week ago
3,675
I hate how the big teams get the decisions all the time.

Ridiculous.
Number 1
16 years ago
11 months ago
3,650
What a game-ruining cunt.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
I hate how the big teams get the decisions all the time.

Ridiculous.

It's mind-boggling how that's been given. For the linesman to overrule the referee he has to be 100% sure.
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Linesman gave it initially, ref just asked him if Gouffran was in Hart's way, and he said yes
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
What a game-ruining cunt.


Hardly ruined the game, it was after 30 mins and it's still 1-0
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
Linesman gave it initially, ref just asked him if Gouffran was in Hart's way, and he said yes

Which he clearly wasn't. I don't see how he can get that wrong.
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Which he clearly wasn't. I don't see how he can get that wrong.


Hardly "clearly", plus he's on the opposite side than the camera, depth perception can be a bitch
Poe
18 years ago
1 week ago
3,675
Hardly ruined the game, it was after 30 mins and it's still 1-0


Should be 1-1 though.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
Hardly "clearly", plus he's on the opposite side than the camera, depth perception can be a bitch

It was as clear as day that Gouffran was in no way obstructing Hart's view. No idea how you can defend that decision.
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Should be 1-1 though.


Aye, but it's not like he sent 5 people off for complaining about it. Newcastle are still on top and will be unlucky not to score again before half time. Didn't ruin the game in fairness
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
http://i.minus.com/ibv9rJvzT7zym1.gif

If anyone is obstructing Hart's view, it's a City player.
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
It was as clear as day that Gouffran was in no way obstructing Hart's view. No idea how you can defend that decision.




Also 'clear as day' on a fucking replay, not in real time from the other side like the lineman saw
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
It's clear to anyone without Manchester City-tinted glasses that the goal should never have been ruled out. He isn't interfering with an opponent.
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
It's clear to anyone without Manchester City-tinted glasses that the goal should never have been ruled out. He isn't interfering with an opponent.


I didn't say it should have been ruled out. I gave reasons for the decision to be made as it was.

Also Mark Halsey doesn't have City-tinted glasses
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Apparently ref overruled the linesman \o/
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
I didn't say it should have been ruled out. I gave reasons for the decision to be made as it was.

Also Mark Halsey doesn't have City-tinted glasses

Fine, but even if it's clearer on the replay it's still a shocking decision. I can understand that he's offside if he's interfering with play but I do not understand how he can be interpreted as doing so. He isn't anywhere near to obstructing Hart and hasn't touched the ball.
Slashman X
18 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdyZ3RjIIAEphgo.jpg:large

Guess ref assumed he blocked Hart's movement

You'll need to Login to comment