Krzysztof Siłka - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack

2000210746

Timeline

2304x3456
In Progress by marrtac on 03 Nov 2022 20:28:47
Completed by mons on 05 Nov 2022 12:38:02
250x250
This image is part of a pack: mixpack
Pending by marrtac on 05 Nov 2022 12:29:10
Completed by mons on 05 Nov 2022 12:38:02
2250x3375
This image is part of a pack: Wisla Kraków
Pending by ajmace_04 on 10 Feb 2023 12:04:46
Rejected by mons on 10 Feb 2023 13:16:30
mons
18 years ago
48 minutes ago
90,964

@ajmace_04, these are all excellent sources, but several of them have excellent and very recent cuts already. As per the guidelines:

 

  • If you are requesting an image for a person who already has a cut in the megapack, please make sure that the source you are uploading will produce an improvement. We don't consider a newer image to be automatically an improvement since we also take quality of source and cut into consideration. If the current megapack cut is recent and similar in look (check on his/her timeline before uploading an image), there is little added value in cutting another source for the person. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative. Please keep in mind that we have a limited number of cutters and hundreds of thousands of images in the megapack, so we can't update them every few months or so.
ajmace_04
9 years ago
1 day ago
13,787
By mons 10 February 2023 - 13:16 PM UTC 

@ajmace_04, from the guidelines:

 

  • If you are requesting an image for a person who already has a cut in the megapack, please make sure that the source you are uploading will produce an improvement. We don't consider a newer image to be automatically an improvement since we also take quality of source and cut into consideration. If the current megapack cut is recent and similar in look (check on his/her timeline before uploading an image), there is little added value in cutting another source for the person. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative. Please keep in mind that we have a limited number of cutters and hundreds of thousands of images in the megapack, so we can't update them every few months or so.

 

Sorry @mons I thought the images which I uploaded were improvements in terms of quality 🙏🏼

mons
18 years ago
48 minutes ago
90,964
By ajmace_04 10 February 2023 - 13:22 PM UTC 

Sorry @mons I thought the images which I uploaded were improvements in terms of quality 🙏🏼

 

They're excellent, true. But there's nothing at all wrong with the current cuts, which are virtually identical and of a very good quality already anyway. With around 6,000 pending images, why should cutters spend their time on images who have a perfectly fine cut already?

ajmace_04
9 years ago
1 day ago
13,787
By mons 10 February 2023 - 13:24 PM UTC 

They're excellent, true. But there's nothing at all wrong with the current cuts, which are virtually identical and of a very good quality already anyway. With around 6,000 pending images, why should cutters spend their time on images who have a perfectly fine cut already?

 

Completely agree with you. Understood mate 👍🏼👍🏼