Oliver Irow - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
2000222081
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
@Brandon A, you need to start following the guidelines, these are not improvements. The images aren't very large, most have been cut very recently and with a virtually identical look, so there isn't any reason why they need to be done again.
I've already explained all this previously and the below are from the guidelines:
- If you are requesting an image for a person who already has a cut in the megapack, please make sure that the source you are uploading will produce an improvement. We don't consider a newer image to be automatically an improvement since we also take quality of source and cut into consideration. If the current megapack cut is recent and similar in look (check on his/her timeline before uploading an image), there is little added value in cutting another source for the person. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative. Please keep in mind that we have a limited number of cutters and hundreds of thousands of images in the megapack, so we can't update them every few months or so.
I agree that the image i added for Oliver Irow isn't that much of an improvement, but a lot of the other source images in the pack i think make enough of a difference, at least as much as the image added for Zach Simons which was approved
I agree that the image i added for Oliver Irow isn't that much of an improvement, but a lot of the other source images in the pack i think make enough of a difference, at least as much as the image added for Zach Simons which was approved
That one had a slightly different haircut. I can't see any in this pack who do too tbh.
@Brandon A, you need to start following the guidelines, these are not improvements. The images aren't very large, most have been cut very recently and with a virtually identical look, so there isn't any reason why they need to be done again.
I've already explained all this previously and the below are from the guidelines: