It very much looks to me like you've used an image enlarger here @MathiasKP, which is not necessary since it smoothens out details in the face and makes it look unnatural, and which you've been asked not to do already. If you don't intend to follow the guidelines, I'd much rather you didn't upload any cuts at all 😕

Poor quality > Good quality

Got it.

Realistic-looking face with blemishes > overly-smoothened waxworks

If you prefer the second, start a megapack yourself. If you want to contribute to this one, give us the first 😕

There's absolutely no need to enlarge this source, it's large enough already and I suspect @geordie1981 rejected his own request because larger versions are available without needing to resort to image enlarging software anyway.

As previously stated in other comment sections, no pictures has been enlargened, its all optimization for very poor quality pictures, if they were fine to begin with i wouldnt do anything to it, also looking at litteraly 1x1 pixels on some faces is horrible but maybe ur monitor cant show that kind of quality perhaps 🙂

Ill stop the uploads from here on since there is no point argueing these minor rules breaks.

As previously implied elsewhere, whatever effect you're doing on faces is making them look like Madame Tussaud's waxworks. My monitor is of a sufficiently good quality and size, actually, thanks for your concern 😉

If all you intend to provide are images like this, then it's best you stop the uploads, yes. Everyone else follows the guidelines and produces excellent cuts. If you don't think that's for you, then there's hardly any point in uploading these cuts.