@PikaPika Gamer, another little something to keep in mind for future cuts.
From a technical standpoint there's very little wrong with your first cut. However, when using remove.bg on a large image in which the face takes up only a small bit of space, it is absolutely imperative to crop the face before using remove.bg on it. The reason is that remove.bg's free tool reduces the final output to an area around 500x500 in size. This means that an image like this will see the face taking up a very small amount of, which will mean that you need to upscale the cropped face to reach the ideal size of 250x250. This will mean that the sharpness of the original source is thus lost, as can be seen when comparing your cut and mine.
Here's a video explaining what I mean:
Basically, if it's a large image, crop the area to around the face when using remove.bg, and you'll get a much better cut 😉
@PikaPika Gamer, another little something to keep in mind for future cuts.
From a technical standpoint there's very little wrong with your first cut. However, when using remove.bg on a large image in which the face takes up only a small bit of space, it is absolutely imperative to crop the face before using remove.bg on it. The reason is that remove.bg's free tool reduces the final output to an area around 500x500 in size. This means that an image like this will see the face taking up a very small amount of, which will mean that you need to upscale the cropped face to reach the ideal size of 250x250. This will mean that the sharpness of the original source is thus lost, as can be seen when comparing your cut and mine.
Here's a video explaining what I mean:
Basically, if it's a large image, crop the area to around the face when using remove.bg, and you'll get a much better cut 😉