Let's be honest,only difference is just few hair,and that's not a reason for an improvement.Current one is more than good HQ recent cut.We have more than 500 real improvements waiting,so this is far from priority,since it's just an alternative.

I get your point, and would understand if it was not prioritised . I just thought it was a very good source , and you could if you wanted get a (slightly) better quality cut from this source than the current one. As far as quality I just think that the current one was a downgrade from the previous version 5.10. So even though I get your point I don't get why you are rejecting it . If someone would do fine, if not also fine. But hey I respect your decision and I will just use the 5.10 version

It's almost identical to the existing megapack image imo. When we have so many sources to cut, we tend to only accept genuine improvements (i.e. sources which are much better or much more recent than existing megapack cuts). Anything not fitting this criteria is rejected so that cutters can focus on the more higher-priority sources. That said, cutters are still free to cut sources like this, if they so wish

To be honest, I can't understand how you can consider the current MP image as a downgrade on the 5.10 version

this is the 10.08 version:

this is the 5.10 version:

Apart from the fact it's 5 years more recent, it's in 250x250 rather than 180x180 and the quality of the hair details and the sharpness of the cut make it a much better cut in my eyes at least

hmm... okay I'm retreating on this one. I've tried to cut the source myself and perhaps there are no real difference sorry

small (in my humble opinion) improvement of the color of current cut:

and a rotation change of my ALT cut: