sortitoutsi Background and Stadium Packs

The Backgrounds Megapack was originally made up of aerial shots of stadiums taken from Google Maps and Google Earth, but is now also containing Competitions, Player and Fan Backgrounds, as well as beautiful City Images.

  • 91,127
  • 2025.01 - Released on 17 Dec 2024
sortitoutsi Background and Stadium Packs

On this page you can find recent comments. Each comment is listed individually alongside the related item that is being commented on. Click on the items name for more context.

Qvordrup
17 years ago
12 hours ago
137,748
By ฮฆฮฉฮคฮ—ฮฃ ฮกฮฉฮœฮ‘ฮ™ฮŸฮฃ 23 July 2024 - 16:55 PM UTC 

thank you my friend good job. 

Please stop resubmitting โ€œpendingโ€ images. They will get moderated i due time ๐Ÿ‘

 



Humberto21
10 years ago
10 hours ago
5,826

7 Submissions 2 Comments
DazS8
15 years ago
11 hours ago
11,848

Not sure what it is with Scotland and these name changes, apparently back to Premier Sports Cup again this season !!!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024%E2%80%9325_Scottish_League_Cup

 

https://spfl.co.uk/league/league-cup

 

 


Humberto21
10 years ago
10 hours ago
5,826
By pires120013 18 June 2024 - 15:55 PM UTC 

yes maybe 800 ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

 

Here's the reason .. (I also downloaded the package days ago, I remembered that there were really a lot of images). In any case, we will gain because I believe there are many more contributions that are currently missing in the pack ๐Ÿ‘


pires120013
12 years ago
5 days ago
1,783
By Humberto21 18 June 2024 - 15:53 PM UTC 

Ok I understand.. I was convinced that you had uploaded them ๐Ÿ˜€ 

I therefore believe that Qvordrup decided to upload them all in any case, given that if I remember correctly there are really many images in the to pack, to check them one by one would take an infinite amount of time ๐Ÿ˜…

 

yes maybe 800 ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ


Humberto21
10 years ago
10 hours ago
5,826
By pires120013 18 June 2024 - 15:46 PM UTC 

i have submit nothing. i have juste propose my pack to Qvordrup in mp.

 

 

So I am not aware of the stadiums that you already have or not ๐Ÿ˜‰

 

Ok I understand.. I was convinced that you had uploaded them ๐Ÿ˜€ 

I therefore believe that Qvordrup decided to upload them all in any case, given that if I remember correctly there are really many images in the to pack, to check them one by one would take an infinite amount of time ๐Ÿ˜…


pires120013
12 years ago
5 days ago
1,783
By Humberto21 18 June 2024 - 15:42 PM UTC 

@pires120013 Even in this case... why insert an identical image with dimensions 800x480?

 

i have submit nothing. i have juste propose my pack to Qvordrup in mp.

 

 

So I am not aware of the stadiums that you already have or not ๐Ÿ˜‰

 


Humberto21
10 years ago
10 hours ago
5,826

@pires120013 Even in this case... why insert an identical image with dimensions 800x480?


Humberto21
10 years ago
10 hours ago
5,826

@pires120013 Again, do you really think this is an improvement?


Humberto21
10 years ago
10 hours ago
5,826

@pires120013 But are you sure this is an improvement?


Copywriter
15 years ago
12 hours ago
2,437

@Qvordrup  now without white side 


1 Submissions 1 Comments
NassFas
3 years ago
6 days ago
1,674

qwe2000
6 years ago
1 day ago
79

I suggest this one (the photo with players on the field) to be made active for inside and the current inside picture to be moved to background


Humberto21
10 years ago
10 hours ago
5,826
By NassFas 11 May 2024 - 16:31 PM UTC 

The image I submitted is from after remodeling @Humberto21 

 

 

Thanks for the tip ๐Ÿ˜‰

in any case, I didn't add it because although at a quick glance it certainly seemed "updated", it didn't represent an "improvement"

I'll try to explain...

proposal
actual

here, essentially this is how we see the photo in many skins, and although your proposal is good it "removes" a considerable part of the field.

When and if possible, it is good to make sure you guarantee a decent margin of space, otherwise the image is "not very effective"

Anyway, I'm sure you know what I'm talking about, but I wanted to write to you to clarify the reason that led me not to include your proposal ๐Ÿ‘


NassFas
3 years ago
6 days ago
1,674

The image I submitted is from after remodeling @Humberto21 


Vuanhhung9x
3 years ago
1 hour ago
2

this is astro turf, not natural


Qvordrup
17 years ago
12 hours ago
137,748

@metachaos#2513 This picture has been stretched or squeezed. When resizing the picture then always keep the proportions of the picture. Can't you see that it looks strange?


5 Submissions 1 Comments
RoCCo_42
18 years ago
42 minutes ago
7,838

Hello. I would like to inform you again that I shared all the updates about this facility ๐Ÿ™‚ The pictures I shared on January 27th are of the facility for children (this facility is not attached in the database 'Kvochkina'). I am organizing and sharing with you a detailed diagram of all the facilities in Almaty that belong to FK Kairat . You can see all the details from there. The last (29.04) pictures I posted (a bit poor quality, I agree) and the one I posted today (better quality but with less details) are of the main training base.


Qvordrup
17 years ago
12 hours ago
137,748

@malman When resizing pictures, then please always resize to nearest size allowed ๐Ÿ‘ Every type of stadium/background has two allowed sizes to avoid blur pictures. I believe your stadium background submissions is more suited for 1600x900 than 1920x1080 ๐Ÿ™‚


Vuanhhung9x
3 years ago
1 hour ago
2

Cizzu
16 years ago
10 hours ago
12,783

@Qvordrup This your pic is very bad.. 


RoCCo_42
18 years ago
42 minutes ago
7,838

Hello. I would like to give you information about this stadium. The images I shared last time and the images I shared before that belong to the main stadium. The image that is currently in the game belongs to the soccer fields in the complex. 

 

I am also sharing an image of the facilities with you.


Qvordrup
17 years ago
12 hours ago
137,748

@Maxdestroyer666 Thanks for your contributions. This one won't go in the pack. No pictures with effects, text or watermarks are accepted in to the pack ๐Ÿ‘


Alieeks
2 years ago
14 hours ago
1,867

Just saw that the active background is pretty recent, the photo on that is old. Its a photo of Rose back on the early 2020's- 2021.


Qvordrup
17 years ago
12 hours ago
137,748

@Steven Padouvas Thanks for the contribution. This stadium picture is a inside stadium picture and not a stadium background. This picture is quit blurred in 1600x900 pix, and would be better of in 800x480 pix (inside stadium). There are two sizes allowed for each type of background/stadium for a reason, and please resize any picture to the nearest size. Feel free to resize the picture and submit it as a inside stadium picture ๐Ÿ‘


stuparchmarino
11 months ago
22 hours ago
2,097
By Qvordrup 10 April 2024 - 14:59 PM UTC 

@stuparchmarino Please stop submitting pictures that has been stretched. You can not stretch the pictures one way or the other it looks strange. Always keep the proportions of the picture intact

 

I sent you correctly the 2nd pic, probably it depends on original format. Sorry, I'll try to pay attention about, but it was not my intention being boring.


1 Submissions 1 Comments
Qvordrup
17 years ago
12 hours ago
137,748

@LuisBravo1989 no text or watermark on the pictures ๐Ÿ‘


Qvordrup
17 years ago
12 hours ago
137,748

@stuparchmarino Please stop submitting pictures that has been stretched. You can not stretch the pictures one way or the other it looks strange. Always keep the proportions of the picture intact


Qvordrup
17 years ago
12 hours ago
137,748

@LuisBravo1989 no pictures with watermarks or text goes in to the pack. besides this picture is also bad quality, and also I think this is Ole Bjur.