Dominik Szoboszlai - Submissions - Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

16202373

Timeline

spix22
8 years ago
1 month ago
1,644
oups @mons Sorry


Correct Name :Dominik Szoboszlai
IUD :16202373
mons
17 years ago
2 minutes ago
86,080
mons
17 years ago
2 minutes ago
86,080
@RidaneGomes, I don't think this is an improvement to be honest, really. There are very little hair details and hardly any difference in the guy's look between the current megapack cut and this one.
mons
17 years ago
2 minutes ago
86,080
Make sure you download the megapack and all its updates. As you can see, this is in the megapack already.
Jaygaynon
6 years ago
4 years ago
24
Much appreciated mons that was my 1st time asking for a pic hoped I did it right?
If I need another for anyone else should I ask you or just repeat what I did?
mons
17 years ago
2 minutes ago
86,080
Much appreciated mons that was my 1st time asking for a pic hoped I did it right?
If I need another for anyone else should I ask you or just repeat what I did?

No worries, but you need to make sure that you only request images in the missing category for those which are missing from the megapack, which was not the case here. Also, if you have the latest version of the MP, i.e. 11.13, you will avoid making requests of images already in it, like this one
mons
17 years ago
2 minutes ago
86,080
I'm sorry @MarquitoDoRatinho, but I just can't agree that this is an improvement or that the current excellent and recent megapack cut needs light correcting. The source you've posted has most of his left side shrouded in shadow whereas the current cut not only is identical in style but also has an evenly-spread lighting on it.
mons
17 years ago
2 minutes ago
86,080
I'm sorry @MarquitoDoRatinho, but I just can't agree that this is an improvement or that the current excellent and recent megapack cut needs light correcting. The source you've posted has most of his left side shrouded in shadow whereas the current cut not only is identical in style but also has an evenly-spread lighting on it.

It's not a bad source in itself, but the best outcome from it would only really be an alternate imo...
mons
17 years ago
2 minutes ago
86,080
It's a decent source, but his look is almost identical to his current cut, so it's not really an improvement.

The same source has also already been rejected elsewhere.
mons
17 years ago
2 minutes ago
86,080
a) This source has already been requested, and rejected.
b) No need to request it twice, either