Jesús Corona - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
51012751
Background and Stadium Packs
Submitted
24 Aug 2023 11:42:18
Timeline
This image is part of a pack:
Chivas USA [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
FC Twente 2015 [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
FC Porto 15-16 [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
FC Porto 16/17 [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
FCP [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
FCP [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
Porto [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
FCP [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
Mexico (WC 2018) [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
Mexico (WC 2018) [Old Request]
I understand. Just thought that "improvement" would also consider image updating.
I understand. Just thought that "improvement" would also consider image updating.
Depends on the source. These just aren't good enough, unfortunately...
Deleted Account #1110205
This image is part of a pack:
FC Porto [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
FC Porto [Old Request]
In Progress
by Tavarestavares
on 02 Jan 2021 00:51:57
Pending
by mons
on 04 Apr 2021 10:13:20
Completed
by mons
on 04 Apr 2021 10:13:24
This image is part of a pack:
Porto
Pending
by Belajariman
on 11 Sep 2021 19:09:00
Completed
by mons
on 12 Sep 2021 06:47:25
This image is part of a pack:
LaLiga Santander 2021/22 Minipack
Pending
by DarkNaples
on 10 Mar 2022 16:37:05
Completed
by mons
on 10 Mar 2022 17:21:55
This image is part of a pack:
Sevilla 22-23 (ESP)
I refer to points 4 and 5 of the guidelines to improvement requests:
Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality.
Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative.
In the case of the above request, none of the above are valid and therefore it is not an improvement.