Harvey Elliott - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack

29233143

Timeline

weeniehutjr
6 years ago
1 month ago
5,216
@monkey3379 This requests section is for players who are in the official database, the player you've requested has a non-default UID and is from a third-party database
monkey3379
12 years ago
16 hours ago
45
Premium
@monkey3379 This requests section is for players who are in the official database, the player you've requested has a non-default UID and is from a third-party database


Oh i didn't realise that. Cant it be added to the database with a config file?
mons
18 years ago
13 minutes ago
90,902
Oh i didn't realise that. Cant it be added to the database with a config file?

Yes, it can, using the same process outlined in this thread

However the UID will differ in everybody's save game depending on the combination of editor data files they're running. This is different from the persons in the official SI database who all have fixed UIDs; this means that it makes no sense adding it to the megapack and therefore we don't accept it as a request.
mons
18 years ago
13 minutes ago
90,902
Download the megapack and please use better sources when making requests...
mons
18 years ago
13 minutes ago
90,902
It's almost identical to the existing megapack cut which is only a couple of months old anyway.
HRiddick
15 years ago
13 hours ago
34,939
Dominik88LE
9 years ago
4 months ago
738
It's almost identical to the existing megapack cut which is only a couple of months old anyway.


sorry, is not identical ok rejected request no problem, but don't say it is identical bad glasses?
mons
18 years ago
13 minutes ago
90,902
sorry, is not identical ok rejected request no problem, but don't say it is identical bad glasses?

I said it's "almost identical" actually. Perhaps it's you whose glasses are bad?

What's so different between the requests, then? The hairstyle is almost (and I've underlined it so you spot it this time ) the same shape and form. Even the facial hair is almost exactly the same. I wouldn't be at all surprised if both this source and the one from which the cut is taken from were taken within a few days of each other.

This is not an improvement; what is ultimately the benefit in somebody taking the time to cut this as opposed to using the existing cut?
Baja
14 years ago
1 day ago
35,850
There's no any real difference to be honest,same hairstyle (just different angle) this is just an alternative.
JasonLFC10
13 years ago
1 day ago
2,767
Premium
There's no any real difference to be honest,same hairstyle (just different angle) this is just an alternative.


Fair enough, I might have a go at it as an alternative because I think this angle will give a bigger, better cut with more face in the image
JasonLFC10
13 years ago
1 day ago
2,767
Premium
Alternative assuming the top not was behind the head, gives a fuller face
mons
18 years ago
13 minutes ago
90,902
Alternative assuming the top not was behind the head, gives a fuller face

I'm afraid that the edges of the initial cut-out are a bit jagged. If you crop the source to around the face and put this through remove.bg, I'm pretty sure you'd get a better final cut
JasonLFC10
13 years ago
1 day ago
2,767
Premium
I'm afraid that the edges of the initial cut-out are a bit jagged. If you crop the source to around the face and put this through remove.bg, I'm pretty sure you'd get a better final cut


I did think that too actually, not sure what went wrong, I might start it again... I don't think I can do remove.bg is that for Photoshop? I use GIMP unfortunately
mons
18 years ago
13 minutes ago
90,902
I did think that too actually, not sure what went wrong, I might start it again... I don't think I can do remove.bg is that for Photoshop? I use GIMP unfortunately

Go on www.remove.bg and you'll see what I mean You literally upload the source and it is cut pretty much instantly. For free. In very good quality. It's a godsend, really.

GIMP really isn't good enough to provide cuts of a sufficiently good quality, I'm afraid, as it doesn't really have the tools to provide the kind of detail we aim for. Instead of Photoshop, try going onto www.photopea.com, which does almost precisely the same things as Photoshop but online and, again, for free
JasonLFC10
13 years ago
1 day ago
2,767
Premium
Go on www.remove.bg and you'll see what I mean You literally upload the source and it is cut pretty much instantly. For free. In very good quality. It's a godsend, really.

GIMP really isn't good enough to provide cuts of a sufficiently good quality, I'm afraid, as it doesn't really have the tools to provide the kind of detail we aim for. Instead of Photoshop, try going onto www.photopea.com, which does almost precisely the same things as Photoshop but online and, again, for free


Thanks for the tips I will check them out, appreciated!
JasonLFC10
13 years ago
1 day ago
2,767
Premium
Thanks for the tips I will check them out, appreciated!


@mons This is the cut from remove.bg with a bit of clean up;
JasonLFC10
13 years ago
1 day ago
2,767
Premium
@mons

sorry for all the tags, this is with the right ear put back in and some collar;



do you think this would be an improvement or not?


JasonLFC10
13 years ago
1 day ago
2,767
Premium
mons
18 years ago
13 minutes ago
90,902
@mons

sorry for all the tags, this is with the right ear put back in and some collar;



do you think this would be an improvement or not?

I'm not sure how you cleaned up but the hair at the top isn't very good. Bar a bit of red snow removal (albeit using Photoshop) the remove.bg cut was good enough already.

Here's my attempt.