Arthur Inaka - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
2000063705
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
Can we have the original sources for these 2 rejected cuts @iLLs`?
Please avoid using image enlarging software, or whatever tool you used to make him look like a waxwork. Using an AI image enlarger just “guesses” what certain pixels should look like when you make the image larger, and the result looks blurry/out of focus on certain details, with unrealistically smoothened skin, and unnatural looking hair/beard/eye/teeth details.
https://nachwuchs.eintracht.de/u21/2023-2024/kader/arthur-inaka-kuki/
https://nachwuchs.eintracht.de/u21/2023-2024/kader/arthur-inaka-kuki/
Whatever you've done to that very good source image has made the final cut look like a bad taxidermy or a waxwork. Please avoid doing it again in any future cuts 👍
Whatever you've done to that very good source image has made the final cut look like a bad taxidermy or a waxwork. Please avoid doing it again in any future cuts 👍
I just can't imagine how to make a better cut-off from this source
I just can't imagine how to make a better cut-off from this source
The second cut contains face imperfections and is therefore better than the first cut, which was overly and unnecessarily photoshopped.
The second cut contains face imperfections and is therefore better than the first cut, which was overly and unnecessarily photoshopped.
I sometimes use "Reduce noise and sharpen" from "Improve cuts" PS action. I find it has a pretty good effect sometimes. But it probably adds a little bit of unreality
I sometimes use "Reduce noise and sharpen" from "Improve cuts" PS action. I find it has a pretty good effect sometimes. But it probably adds a little bit of unreality
That's one action I never really use these days. That action file was created a fair few years back when sources were very poor and fuzzy, and it helped improve the eventual cut. With larger, good-quality sources such as this one, it's not really needed.
That's one action I never really use these days. That action file was created a fair few years back when sources were very poor and fuzzy, and it helped improve the eventual cut. With larger, good-quality sources such as this one, it's not really needed.
Thanks for the advice!
Can we have the original sources for these 2 rejected cuts @iLLs`?
Please avoid using image enlarging software, or whatever tool you used to make him look like a waxwork. Using an AI image enlarger just “guesses” what certain pixels should look like when you make the image larger, and the result looks blurry/out of focus on certain details, with unrealistically smoothened skin, and unnatural looking hair/beard/eye/teeth details.