Tomás Quilici - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
14182573
Background and Stadium Packs
Submitted
21 Mar 2018 03:35:08
Timeline
This image is a response to
#188316
Hello @mons
In my opinion, it depends on the initial source but also (and especially) the sensitivity of the cutter.
For me this cup is not bad in 250x250, but for you it's better in 180x180
The grain of this source is (whatever the format) of poor quality
With both formats, there will be many debates because it's subjective
However, i'me ok to pass it in 180x180
I let you moderate
Thank you
In my opinion, it depends on the initial source but also (and especially) the sensitivity of the cutter.
For me this cup is not bad in 250x250, but for you it's better in 180x180
The grain of this source is (whatever the format) of poor quality
With both formats, there will be many debates because it's subjective
However, i'me ok to pass it in 180x180
I let you moderate
Thank you
Hello @mons
In my opinion, it depends on the initial source but also (and especially) the sensitivity of the cutter.
For me this cup is not bad in 250x250, but for you it's better in 180x180
The grain of this source is (whatever the format) of poor quality
With both formats, there will be many debates because it's subjective
However, i'me ok to pass it in 180x180
I let you moderate
Thank you
Oh, I completely agree with you that the size will be subjective and the cut isn't bad at all
However, it all depends on the source. When you increase the dimensions of an image or a cut, it is inevitable that its quality will diminish as it will get less sharp, more blurry and the hair details will lose focus. That is why I suggest that the only sources to be cut in 250x250 are the ones where the face is already larger than those dimensions. If it is smaller than that, I would suggest having the cut in 180x180.
Of course, at the end the cutter will decide what size he wants to produce his cut in, and that's his right - but I believe this method will allow us to maintain the high megapack standards we have always had
mons