It's newer source bro,but really bad quality so this one is just an alternative

What do you mean 'never source'?
Previous image isn't very good, plus he looks like he was 12yrs old.
It's true the quality of this cut isn't great but I'd say it's improvement simply because of the timeline - he actually looks like a man here, original image he looks like he's a kid.

Newer
Like I said main problem is the quality wich is awfull,don't get me wrong I know that you've done everything that you could,simply source is poor.Still that's not the real improvement,and current one is from 2014 so not that old.I'm not sure about this one:

I looked at that one too but didn't think it was that great. Either way, I'll keep an eye out for an improved image of him in the future.