Feed
Football Manager 2020 is available to Play Now! Buy now, play instantly. Get these essential add ons to enhance Football Manager 2020 Want updated squads for FM20? We have the worlds biggest FM2020 Data Update. 2 minutes ago
JunkieUnited commented on: TCM20 Logopack by TCMLogos
5 minutes ago
A new version of our data update was released with 31407 changes from 124 contributors.
29 minutes ago
Tommy Hughes commented on: 3D Official Kits Thread
35 minutes ago
Willz72 commented on: FM20 Data Tweaks v2.9 [31/03/2020]
36 minutes ago
samjh86 commented on: How to filter loan deals to only show 0% contribution options?
36 minutes ago
samjh86 added a topic: How to filter loan deals to only show 0% contribution options?
59 minutes ago
priority76 commented on: 3D Official Kits Thread
1 hour ago
HockeyBhoy commented on: Now I would walk 500 miles...
1 hour ago
priority76 commented on: Belgium - Proximus League 3D'2019/20 for FM20 New! (04/04/20)
1 hour ago
globalpixels commented on: FM20 Adboard Patch - V1.2 Out Now!!!
1 hour ago
DoctorBenjyFM added a video: GLORY HUNTER FM20 | #117 | MY FUTURE TEAM??? | Football Manager 2020
1 hour ago
HockeyBhoy commented on: Now I would walk 500 miles...
1 hour ago
Chocomonster commented on: Scotland - Scottish Lower Leagues SS'19/20 New! (18/03/20) - Not SSKCC yet!
1 hour ago
stevenlam completed a season in their Football Manager career: new job
1 hour ago
stevenlam added a career: new job
1 hour ago
JakovJ commented on: Standard Fantasy/Request Logo only (NO PACKS) Thread
1 hour ago
Benjamin222 commented on: Germany Staff Missing and Improvement Mixpack
1 hour ago
Benjamin222 commented on: Facepacks Release thread - NO REQUESTS
1 hour ago
Benjamin222 added a download: Germany Staff Missing and Improvement Mixpack
2 hours ago
Eltarian commented on: Facepacks Release thread - NO REQUESTS
2 hours ago
Eltarian added a download: FC Hansa Rostock Teampack
2 hours ago
Callum Grundon commented on: Need Help Transfering custom database to latest data update
2 hours ago
Callum Grundon added a topic: Need Help Transfering custom database to latest data update
2 hours ago
HeadCoachFM commented on: F.C. Valdelavilla (English Club in the Spanish Pyramid)
2 hours ago
A new version of our data update was released with 31402 changes from 124 contributors.
2 hours ago
Baja commented on: Image finder thread - assistance in finding a source image
2 hours ago
hammer9 commented on: Spain - La Liga Santader 3D'2019/20 for FM20 New! (11/12/19)
2 hours ago
norwichcity87 commented on: Spain - La Liga Santader 3D'2019/20 for FM20 New! (11/12/19)
3 hours ago
Ivs commented on: England - English Leagues Level 7-8 3D'2019/20 for FM20 Relink! (31/03/20)
3 hours ago
Mischa commented on: SS Fantasy Kits ONLY Thread (NO REAL KITS)
Type
Improvement
Date Requested
05 Feb 2020 14:50:20
Requested By
Player
Kasper Dolberg
Player ID
27102380
View Existing Cuts
Current Status
Completed
Date Completed
05 Feb 2020 14:50:20
Completed By
Moderate Request
Discussion
Don't ask me why, but I really don't like the current cut of Kasper Dolberg. The quality of the cut is great, but there is something about the picture I don't like
Don't ask me why, but I really don't like the current cut of Kasper Dolberg. The quality of the cut is great, but there is something about the picture I don't like

Nothing personal mate,but same as me for new one...looks less quality and his hair at the end looks blur (mix of hair and background).
https://i.imgur.com/7TeM2re.jpg
Nothing personal mate,but same as me for new one...looks less quality and his hair at the end looks blur (mix of hair and background).

Well as I said in the earlier post, it has nothing to with the quality of the current cut, and in my opinion a better picture outweighs a slightly better quality cut. But this is when we get to a point where it is personal preferences and nothing else. So I just share this cut and if it doesn't make it to the mp... hey then it doesn't make it, and life goes on

if you can make a better cut out of the source please do:

https://i.imgur.com/yjwQzNK.jpg
I completaly understand and respect mate,but then it's better to use the alternative thread with this kind of cuts.Mons often can replace it by the mistake as improvement.Like I was thinking,source wasn't that great/big for HQ cut.I'm too busy by fixing/re-cut buch of "improvements" from last update,wich are not improvements,and wich goes in by same "mistake"...
https://i.imgur.com/7TeM2re.jpg
@mons after some constructive criticism from baja I have tried to improve the cut, by fixing the bottom hair detail after the best of my ability. I still thinks this cut is better than the current one, despite being a (slightly) inferior cut measured by quality. And I think if this is the policy then it should be changed. A more recent cut should always be accepted unless there are huge difference in quality... I'm not so much a fan of the approach of going in to tiny detail about hair. Put hey it is up to you. Just an opinion

https://i.imgur.com/qgUUDou.png
@mons after some constructive criticism from baja I have tried to improve the cut, by fixing the bottom hair detail after the best of my ability. I still thinks this cut is better than the current one, despite being a (slightly) inferior cut measured by quality. And I think if this is the policy then it should be changed. A more recent cut should always be accepted unless there are huge difference in quality... I'm not so much a fan of the approach of going in to tiny detail about hair. Put hey it is up to you. Just an opinion

https://i.imgur.com/qgUUDou.png

As a rule of thumb, it's my preference to use newer cuts whenever available, especially if the current MP cut is fairly old. That said, if it's a matter of months and there is little difference in the person's looks, then I use the one with the best quality. Quality considerations include orientation, cut colour. snow and hair details, amongst others. Hair details are definitely not the be-all and end-all when I compare cuts, but they are of course important, especially if the source and/or the current cut is of a good quality.

I won't be on my PC to compare this cut till tomorrow evening, so I can't say what my decision will be yet. I don't see much wrong with the existing cut to be honest bar the lighting.
As a rule of thumb, it's my preference to use newer cuts whenever available, especially if the current MP cut is fairly old. That said, if it's a matter of months and there is little difference in the person's looks, then I use the one with the best quality. Quality considerations include orientation, cut colour. snow and hair details, amongst others. Hair details are definitely not the be-all and end-all when I compare cuts, but they are of course important, especially if the source and/or the current cut is of a good quality.

I won't be on my PC to compare this cut till tomorrow evening, so I can't say what my decision will be yet. I don't see much wrong with the existing cut to be honest bar the lighting.

Well you heard my opinion and that is all that counts. I don't need to hear what your decision is. For me it is not important whether my cuts make the mp or not (I just include them in my own mp anyway), I just like to challenge when I think the comments are perhaps a bit to harsh (or concerning very small details) , because I think you (not specific you, but more in general) might scare away potential cutters.

«This comment has been edited»
Don't ask me why, but I really don't like the current cut of Kasper Dolberg. The quality of the cut is great, but there is something about the picture I don't like


Your newly picture is way better expression on Dolbergs face.
Expression counts too, besides quality.
A pic shouldn`t make an idiot out of a person.
Trust me, I worked at a german record label with professional fotographers.
Better take slight minus in quality instead of ultra-high quality of a dumb shoot.

Therefore I thank you Qvordrup

«This comment has been edited»
Login to post a comment

Login Register