they are back xD @RT7

Whaha

The area of the face in that source image isn't the biggest, so when it is cut, it will only be large enough to provide a 180x180 cut-out. To provide a 250x250, it will need to be upscaled, which will mean it loses sharpness. With that in mind, it won't provide an improvement unless the source image is much bigger or much sharper.

No hair details, so it's not an improvement.

 

@LxbilePogba, I recommend using remove.bg for your cuts. It's a fantastic free online tool which does the heavy lifting for you by removing the background in the source image, leaving you to only rotate, crop and/or nudge the collar upwards. It's tremendously easy to use and provides fantastic quality. With it, you can go from source to cut in a couple of minutes for the vast majority of images. 

 

Take a look at this thread for guidelines for cutters and video tutorials for some more info on what we expect for from our cuts. 

 

Here's a couple of videos on how to use remove.bg, one when combined with Photoshop and another using photopea.com, which is a free online app so close to Photoshop that it has the same shortcuts, layout and icons 😉 If you don't have Photoshop, photopea.com is the tool I would recommend to use to tweak the draft cut produced by remove.bg. It's more powerful and versatile than GIMP and other similar tools.

 

 

By mons 23 August 2022 - 06:13 AM UTC 

No hair details, so it's not an improvement.

 

@LxbilePogba, I recommend using remove.bg for your cuts. It's a fantastic free online tool which does the heavy lifting for you by removing the background in the source image, leaving you to only rotate, crop and/or nudge the collar upwards. It's tremendously easy to use and provides fantastic quality. With it, you can go from source to cut in a couple of minutes for the vast majority of images. 

 

Take a look at this thread for guidelines for cutters and video tutorials for some more info on what we expect for from our cuts. 

 

Here's a couple of videos on how to use remove.bg, one when combined with Photoshop and another using photopea.com, which is a free online app so close to Photoshop that it has the same shortcuts, layout and icons 😉 If you don't have Photoshop, photopea.com is the tool I would recommend to use to tweak the draft cut produced by remove.bg. It's more powerful and versatile than GIMP and other similar tools.

 

 

 

I used remove.bg

By LxbilePogba 23 August 2022 - 06:26 AM UTC 

I used remove.bg

 

Then the source wasn't good enough, or the image-editing software or technique you used removed all the hair details 😕