Marvin Zeegelaar - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
37005651
Background and Stadium Packs
Submitted
28 Nov 2021 00:46:20
Timeline
This image is part of a pack:
World Mixpack 7 [Old Pack Submission]
This image is a response to
#154899
Already done somewhere at site,but not considered as improvement.Also,this is not even best available source.
Already done somewhere at site,but not considered as improvement.Also,this is not even best available source.
Sorry about that, you wouldn't know where I could find it would you?
I'm looking for him right now,if I found him,I'll send you 
@BajaHater and @Sir William, Here it is
For future reference, you can search whether the same player (and the same source) have already been requested by using the section outlined in the attached screenshot.
For future reference, you can search whether the same player (and the same source) have already been requested by using the section outlined in the attached screenshot.
@BajaHater and @Sir William, Here it is
For future reference, you can search whether the same player (and the same source) have already been requested by using the section outlined in the attached screenshot.
My opinion is clear,current one is better as you know @mons
Main reason is because original source is done from HQ source
It's debatable whether this would be an improvement
As posted elsewhere for a similar reason, the current megapack image was only created a couple of months or so ago and it's cut from a high-quality source. While your source is good (and I wish all players had source images as good and easy to cut), I just don't see the point in having a slightly different cut to the existing megapack version and I would much rather see cutters spending time on genuine improvements and missing images.
Apart from the source quality, you should also keep in mind the existing megapack image when making a request. Just because it's a newer image doesn't necessarily mean it's an improvement. I'm not rejecting it, but I doubt whether I'd consider any resulting cut for inclusion into the MP. Just letting you know so you keep it in mind for any future requests
Thanks mons and I will take everything you said into consideration
My opinion is clear,current one is better as you know @mons
I agree with you 100% and the present image will remain in the megapack until a better one comes along. However, I forwarded a link to the other request in case @Sir William wants to use it in his game, which he is perfectly entitled to do, and also to notify him how he can use the search function to see if the same request was recently done
This image is part of a pack:
Watford [10.09] [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
Watford [10.09] [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
Watford [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
Udinese fC [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
Udinese
Pending
by Side Splitting Pass
on 05 Jan 2021 18:29:13
In Progress
by alex164
on 06 Jan 2021 04:39:09
Completed
by mons
on 07 Jan 2021 13:33:23
This image is part of a pack:
Udinese
This image is part of a pack:
Udinese
This image is part of a pack:
Udinese Calcio 2021/22
Pending
by DarkNaples
on 12 Nov 2021 23:40:52
Completed
by mons
on 13 Nov 2021 08:29:41
As posted elsewhere for a similar reason, the current megapack image was only created a couple of months or so ago and it's cut from a high-quality source. While your source is good (and I wish all players had source images as good and easy to cut), I just don't see the point in having a slightly different cut to the existing megapack version and I would much rather see cutters spending time on genuine improvements and missing images.
Apart from the source quality, you should also keep in mind the existing megapack image when making a request. Just because it's a newer image doesn't necessarily mean it's an improvement. I'm not rejecting it, but I doubt whether I'd consider any resulting cut for inclusion into the MP. Just letting you know so you keep it in mind for any future requests