Andrej Đukić - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
2000161246
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
I don't think this warrants cutting @Baja, so I'm rejecting it. If @Drafter or another staff member rejects it, you should make sure to respect that decision.
If you as a cutter can't be bothered to cut it within 5 months, that's even more reason not to keep it on the pending list. As always, if you want to cut it yourself, I'll be sure to consider it for addition. I respect your past contributions but the rules apply to you, just the same as they do for everyone else.
With all due respect,I was thinking that difference of 2-3 years between images,profile image instead side image,and as both of you told me that those Prva liga sources are more than good for decent cuts is enough reason.
At the end I respect your decision.Maybe I'll do it during next few days,but the problem for me are tiny hair details on the right side.
Drafter and I have two completaly different point of view/criteriums in many things,especially in cuts.If there was a block option like on some social networks,I would use it,so we won't have any contact at all and could keep completaly out of each others way,but we don't…
Just because I'm not doing cuts as before (I simply don't have a time) doesn't mean I've lost criterium and knowledge.Anyway again,I understand and respect your decision.Thank you.
With all due respect,I was thinking that difference of 2-3 years between images,profile image instead side image,and as both of you told me that those Prva liga sources are more than good for decent cuts is enough reason.
At the end I respect your decision.Maybe I'll do it during next few days,but the problem for me are tiny hair details on the right side.
Drafter and I have two completaly different point of view/criteriums in many things,especially in cuts.If there was a block option like on some social networks,I would use it,so we won't have any contact at all and could keep completaly out of each others way,but we don't…
Just because I'm not doing cuts as before (I simply don't have a time) doesn't mean I've lost criterium and knowledge.Anyway again,I understand and respect your decision.Thank you.
@Drafter is putting in the time to cut and evaluate these old packs, and I trust his judgement. I appreciate you might not have the time these days to contribute cuts, and that's fair enough, but you nonetheless seem to find the time anyway to comment on those of us who do, as well as finding the time to request images too. If you have time to do that, perhaps you could find the time to do 1 cut a day, or 5 cuts a week. If you did that, your pending list would have been completed long before now, and we wouldn't be repeating these kind of discussions tediously over and over again.
With respect, you come here once every blue moon and expect things to remain the same as they were when you last popped up. You have steadfastly refused to use remove.bg and complained about every single change we've tried to make down the years, including the now-not-so-new forum system. It's not fair to stand atop your ivory tower and criticise those of us who are here all the time, working on reducing the request list.
I don't think this warrants cutting @Baja, so I'm rejecting it. If @Drafter or another staff member rejects it, you should make sure to respect that decision.
If you as a cutter can't be bothered to cut it within 5 months, that's even more reason not to keep it on the pending list. As always, if you want to cut it yourself, I'll be sure to consider it for addition. I respect your past contributions but the rules apply to you, just the same as they do for everyone else.