Marc Bernal - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
2000295603Timeline
@owusu26, it's high time you read the guidelines so that you can understand what is an improvement, and what isn't. With the current cut being very good and very recent, replacing it with an image where the face is half in shadow makes no sense at all.
There are loads of cuts like this mate which have been approved. No issue, if you don't use them personally, but someone might.
There are loads of cuts like this mate which have been approved. No issue, if you don't use them personally, but someone might.
Can you pinpoint a couple of similar examples which were added to the megapack?
You have uploaded plenty of cuts which aren't in line with the megapack. I for one have given you repeated feedback, which you have generally ignored.
The forum isn't there for people to upload whatever they want - but to upload images following the guidelines, which are there to attempt to have a standardised look. You're perfectly entitled to cut images in the way that you want, in much the same way that I'm perfectly entitled to reject them and point out why they shouldn't necessarily be posted here.
Can you pinpoint a couple of similar examples which were added to the megapack?
You have uploaded plenty of cuts which aren't in line with the megapack. I for one have given you repeated feedback, which you have generally ignored.
The forum isn't there for people to upload whatever they want - but to upload images following the guidelines, which are there to attempt to have a standardised look. You're perfectly entitled to cut images in the way that you want, in much the same way that I'm perfectly entitled to reject them and point out why they shouldn't necessarily be posted here.
2091, 2349, 6052 I can list at least twenty more examples.
No issues with rejecting the images, you don't need to be rude or sassy about it.
If you reject them in the future that's fine. However, me and other players may use the rejected cuts, as we may think they look better or cleaner. It's personal preference. It's not dictatorship mate, it's a community game.
2091, 2349, 6052 I can list at least twenty more examples.
No issues with rejecting the images, you don't need to be rude or sassy about it.
If you reject them in the future that's fine. However, me and other players may use the rejected cuts, as we may think they look better or cleaner. It's personal preference. It's not dictatorship mate, it's a community game.
The examples you've chosen are of cuts from 2019, 2020 and non-existent. Is that the best you can do? Of course there are going to be cuts which aren't ideal in a megapack containing half a million images, but that'll inevitably be due to cutters like you ignoring the guidelines.
I've asked you to avoid uploading cuts like this several times now. Polite didn't work, clearly. It's only now that I've been a bit more straight-talking that you've reacted, which justifies me doing so, frankly. And don't use the βother playersβ excuse as a way of justifying the fact that it's you who has been called out for not following the rules, that's being disingenuous.
The guidelines apply to you just like they do to everyone else in the community, if you're so concerned about the community. Don't be a smartass, and just follow them.
The examples you've chosen are of cuts from 2019, 2020 and non-existent. Is that the best you can do? Of course there are going to be cuts which aren't ideal in a megapack containing half a million images, but that'll inevitably be due to cutters like you ignoring the guidelines.
I've asked you to avoid uploading cuts like this several times now. Polite didn't work, clearly. It's only now that I've been a bit more straight-talking that you've reacted, which justifies me doing so, frankly. And don't use the βother playersβ excuse as a way of justifying the fact that it's you who has been called out for not following the rules, that's being disingenuous.
The guidelines apply to you just like they do to everyone else in the community, if you're so concerned about the community. Don't be a smartass, and just follow them.
You asked for an example which proved you're wrong. Those cuts weren't by me and they were accepted by this platform. So again you're wrong and just typing nonsense. Clearly you didn't follow the guildlines thenβ¦
Regardless, you just proved this is about your preference. The community is not your preference only mate. Whatever cuts I upload may be used by other whether you reject them or not, but I will upload content anyone can use. Simple you can't stop me.
You need to grow up and not be rude. I know that's hard for you, but you can tryβ¦ I know you can do it boy π
You asked for an example which proved you're wrong. Those cuts weren't by me and they were accepted by this platform. So again you're wrong and just typing nonsense. Clearly you didn't follow the guildlines thenβ¦
Regardless, you just proved this is about your preference. The community is not your preference only mate. Whatever cuts I upload may be used by other whether you reject them or not, but I will upload content anyone can use. Simple you can't stop me.
You need to grow up and not be rude. I know that's hard for you, but you can tryβ¦ I know you can do it boy π
Someone's having a little temper tantrum, aren't they? Hunker down buddy, and be a good chap π
I can actually stop you by banning your account, in case you hadn't realised. Might as well if that's the approach you're going to take. Save the both of us some time in the long run, I guess, given that you haven't shown the slightest inclination in following our guidelines. If you have a problem with following fairly simple rules which countless others have no problem with, that's your issue. Your choice.
Only upload cuts which follow the guidelines. I can't be clearer than that. This isn't a place for everyone to do what they want.
Someone's having a little temper tantrum, aren't they? Hunker down buddy, and be a good chap π
I can actually stop you by banning your account, in case you hadn't realised. Might as well if that's the approach you're going to take. Save the both of us some time in the long run, I guess, given that you haven't shown the slightest inclination in following our guidelines. If you have a problem with following fairly simple rules which countless others have no problem with, that's your issue. Your choice.
Only upload cuts which follow the guidelines. I can't be clearer than that. This isn't a place for everyone to do what they want.
It's funny how you're copying my mannerisms when I was being sarcastic. It just shows you're completely wrong and upset LOL.
I'm stating facts, so I'm glad you haven't addressed because again you're wrong. You accepted AI alterted facepacks for loads of Benfica players. I'm sure that's acceptable right?
You can ban me, I'll just make other accounts mate not an issue. I'll continue to work and upload cuts which I think are good enough. Be a good lad and respond with more nonsense π
It's funny how you're copying my mannerisms when I was being sarcastic. It just shows you're completely wrong and upset LOL.
I'm stating facts, so I'm glad you haven't addressed because again you're wrong. You accepted AI alterted facepacks for loads of Benfica players. I'm sure that's acceptable right?
You can ban me, I'll just make other accounts mate not an issue. I'll continue to work and upload cuts which I think are good enough. Be a good lad and respond with more nonsense π
Ah, you're one of those βI have to have the last wordβ arguers. So am I - bring it on π
See, this is a better cut. Why you couldn't have just admitted your previous cut had half the face shrouded in shadow, and that this is a preferable source, is beyond me.
The simple fact is that it wasn't an improvement, and all the yapping you're doing has failed to address that fact. As has the fact that you've repeatedly ignored the guidelines previously, and me pointing them out. Which is a pity because you're just wasting your time uploading cuts which aren't improvements, and more importantly wasting my time in having to reject them.
Ah, you're one of those βI have to have the last wordβ arguers. So am I - bring it on π
See, this is a better cut. Why you couldn't have just admitted your previous cut had half the face shrouded in shadow, and that this is a preferable source, is beyond me.
The simple fact is that it wasn't an improvement, and all the yapping you're doing has failed to address that fact. As has the fact that you've repeatedly ignored the guidelines previously, and me pointing them out. Which is a pity because you're just wasting your time uploading cuts which aren't improvements, and more importantly wasting my time in having to reject them.
Clearly you struggle with comprehension.
There was nothing to admit and I clearly told you can reject the cuts. I said I upload the content for someone who would use the cut not for you personally. You're here complaining over and over, while you've inadvertently admitted to ignoring your own guildines LOOL? Again, why are AI altered faces being accepted? Why are other cuts accepted with half shadow? You don't address these questions mate because you're being a hyprocrite.
I don't care if you reject my cuts for the 100th time, I'll still going to upload regardless. You don't need to keep crying about it mate.
I got all day mate so we can go until next week, no problem round 6 here we go π
Clearly you struggle with comprehension.
There was nothing to admit and I clearly told you can reject the cuts. I said I upload the content for someone who would use the cut not for you personally. You're here complaining over and over, while you've inadvertently admitted to ignoring your own guildines LOOL? Again, why are AI altered faces being accepted? Why are other cuts accepted with half shadow? You don't address these questions mate because you're being a hyprocrite.
I don't care if you reject my cuts for the 100th time, I'll still going to upload regardless. You don't need to keep crying about it mate.
I got all day mate so we can go until next week, no problem round 6 here we go π
This forum is for images to be added to the megapack, for which we have guidelines. Since you've clearly admitted you don't intend to follow them, there's really no reason why you should remain a part of this community, especially since you feel we're hypocritical. If you want to come back again under a different name and decide to follow the guidelines, then be my guest π Keep uploading cuts which don't, and I won't even bother engaging again, since you're not engaging in good-faith debate.
I have no idea where I've inadvertently admitted to ignoring the guidelines, and I imagine that, like most of what you've said, it's not a true reflection of reality. There are anywhere between 100-300 cuts uploaded every day, of course some of them may not follow the guidelines because there's only me checking them after all. Which is why it's all the more important that cutters try to help me out and follow the guidelines, so that such images don't end up getting added to the megapack. Instead of focusing on other cuts, perhaps you'd do well to focus on yours, of which a significant proportion have been rejected.
@owusu26, it's high time you read the guidelines so that you can understand what is an improvement, and what isn't. With the current cut being very good and very recent, replacing it with an image where the face is half in shadow makes no sense at all.