Marcin Bułka - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
28111106
Background and Stadium Packs
Submitted
07 Jul 2024 17:40:28
Timeline
@mons , please , reject my source which is pending.
This image is part of a pack:
OGC Nice GK
This image is part of a pack:
small mixpack
This image is part of a pack:
OGC Nice 23-24
Pending
by Rdzin
on 04 Nov 2023 13:33:20
Completed
by Lebohang Mokoena
on 04 Nov 2023 19:10:03
This image is part of a pack:
Poland EURO 2024
This image is part of a pack:
Poland Euro 2024
This image is part of a pack:
Poland EURO 2024
I have to agree with @julkjulk. It's generally considered better to have a slightly older image if it is of better quality. We specifically use the word improvement rather than newer, so do keep that in mind when you go searching for sources which might not necessarily be better, just newer.
There is nothing wrong with the current cut, in which he is looking at the camera and in which the cut quality is very good. The new cut is a solution to a problem which doesn't exist. Of course, you can choose to cut it and use it in your save, but it's not going to be added into the megapack.
On any level you look at it, the first cut is much better than the second one - why should we add the second one?
The reason I'm explaining all this is so that you understand the criteria we use so that you can be guided accordingly in your research and your cuts 👍
You seem to have a general aversion to feedback given. It's up to you what cuts you do and in which manner, but we're not going to change our criteria for assessment just because you don't like them and it's you who should adapt, not us…