Riechedly Bazoer - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
37041762
Background and Stadium Packs
Submitted
22 Sep 2023 19:09:32
Timeline
This image is part of a pack:
AFC Ajax [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Eredivisie Pack 1 [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Complete Eredivisie Pack 1617 [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Eredivisie - FIXED [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Wolfsburg [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
Wolfsburg [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
Wolfsburg [Old Request]
This image is a response to
#178479
Lol why did you edit him, you mirrored the shirt border and closed his mouth? Nothing wrong with a smile 
Although Wolfsburg are not doing great.
Although Wolfsburg are not doing great.
Lol why did you edit him, you mirrored the shirt border and closed his mouth? Nothing wrong with a smile
This is original source - where you see opened mouth? And yes - I'm fix shirt border because it looks terrible (right part)
nevermind...
It looks realistic and in the correct shape, your mirroring results in weird looking shoulders...
I don't mind if you cut better and upload better cut's but this is not what you call an improvement.
You always can use yours version.
You always can use yours version.
@Kruna and @Mr_Orry , there's nothing wrong with having different cuts for similar sources but I'll then decide which one to put into the MP. Both of you are very good cutters and there's no reason for anybody to be offended if I don't choose their option (and they can always use it in their own game, after all), nor is there any point in quibbling with each other about minor technical details such as minor shirt details and facial expression, when that's really a matter of personal preference. No need to get het up about it, after all 
Please respect each other and the fact that other people may not agree with you. And finally, I see very, very little difference between both of your cuts in terms of quality and I doubt that 99.9% of those who use the megapack would either. Let's focus on the real improvements, if possible, rather than slightly different versions of very slightly different sources. Why not spend the time spent doing another source instead; there's plenty of good sources pending which could easily have been cut in the time it took to have this whole conversation - much better use of time for all concerned, no?
Please respect each other and the fact that other people may not agree with you. And finally, I see very, very little difference between both of your cuts in terms of quality and I doubt that 99.9% of those who use the megapack would either. Let's focus on the real improvements, if possible, rather than slightly different versions of very slightly different sources. Why not spend the time spent doing another source instead; there's plenty of good sources pending which could easily have been cut in the time it took to have this whole conversation - much better use of time for all concerned, no?
This image is part of a pack:
VfL Wolfsburg [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
VfL Wolfsburg [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
VfL Wolfsburg [Old Request]
Kruna