xturqz - Comments

#446195 5-2-3 but with GOOD DEFENCE?
xturqz
6 years ago
7 months ago
5
Why not use a realistic formation that isn't broken then... The reason why it's rubbish in defence is because it's an awful formation. Just the game engine can't handle 3 strikers. If you only want to win without a challenge then go ahead use 3 strikers but you may as well just give yourself £1 billion to spend because you want to win without a challenge.
#446194 dsk's 433 narrow
xturqz
6 years ago
7 months ago
5
Yeah 3 strikers is known to be broken, some people argue it's not but they are the ones who refuse to use any other tactic on any save (because they know they suck when they don't use it)
#429679 5-2-3 but with GOOD DEFENCE?
xturqz
6 years ago
7 months ago
5
If you want to be defensively sound then how about try not exploiting the match engine's weakness (3 strikers) and use a real formation.
#429678 Oathbreaker - a Plug & Play 433 for FM18 (UPDATED TO .fmf)
xturqz
6 years ago
7 months ago
5
Strikerless was OP and I refuse to play Strikerless tactics as a matter of principle


But you use OP 3 strikers?