MathiasKP - Comments

have you try SSKCC?

Tottenham home 21/22

 

Atletico Madrid H,AT

That's not how this forum works, and you should know that well by now. If you think players deserve to have new cuts, you should put the hard yards in to collect and request them yourself. However, those images aren't the largest, plus most of them will probably have recent, virtually identical and excellent cut-outs already, so there's no value added in cutting them all just for the sake of having new images. For the ones which are, use the request forum to do them and don't expect somebody else to do them for you.

Going by your previous posts in this forum, it was disingenuous and not based on an honest reading of fact. I note you still haven't mentioned which “high tier teams with new facepacks isnt being cut when some people upload the team pictures” you were referring to, probably because there aren't actually any.

 

And, with respect, saying that “a lot of really low quality pics have been accepted recently for high tier players and it seems kinda weird compared to previous high quality pics of the players” isn't really speaking in a friendly manner, either.

 

Perhaps if questions put to staff were made in good faith, then we wouldn't react so adversely. It's not fun for us either when self-entitled users like you just come here to demand stuff, are impatient, criticise without knowing what they're talking about and expect us to accept all this; that's what I call toxic.

I'm also kinda wondering what teams and images you're talking about. Specific examples would help, because I'm not sure you have any idea what you're talking about. 

 

The highest profile teampacks requested in the last couple of months which I can see that are still pending are Motherwell, West Brom and Vitesse, all of which already have excellent cuts in the megapack (most of which are quite recent anyway). I very much doubt Motherwell, WBA and Vitesse are the ‘high tier’ teams you're referring to anyway. On the other hand, many ‘high tier’ teams have had packs produced in the past few weeks, so your first assertion is frankly a load of hogwash.

 

I review all improvement images produced by the community to determine whether they are actually improvements to the current megapack cuts. As you have been told already (but you seem to struggle to understand), an image is not considered an improvement just because it's newer. The quality of the cut is also taken into consideration, plus lighting, face orientation etc. A lot of these type of images have been produced of late (which is to be expected given the Euro 2020 photoshoots and the new season's photoshoots) and there have been several instances where the previous cut was retained. Remember, just because an image is marked as completed doesn't mean it's added to the megapack. All the completed tag means is that it's to be considered for addition. Given the thousands of images produced every month, I'm sure I'll have made the odd judgement call which might be proven wrong on further review, but I'm confident there won't be more of a handful. If somebody points any of these out, I'd be more than happy to have another look at them and change my initial opinion if warranted (as has happened several times in the past), but blanket statements such as yours are frankly ill-informed and plain wrong.

 

If you really think that there's such a big issue with cutter availability, which I don't believe there is given the large amount of cuts being produced (more than 2,000 cuts since the last update pack 9 days ago), helping out in a tangible manner would be more fruitful than these kind of baseless, pointless comments intended solely to stir shit up. More cutters are always welcome and demand has, does and will always outstrip supply, but I cannot stress just what a fantastic job our cutters are generally doing in the sheer quality and quantity of cuts being produced, and how appreciative I am of their work and that of all the contributors, which is why I take umbrage at your post.