jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516

jojokoning - Comments

Comments
#682670 Yevheniy Kychun
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
24 Mar 2022 08:35:31
By BramNUFC 24 March 2022 - 08:32 AM UTC 

@jojokoning The guidelines say photoshopped images are to be rejected 👍

 

oops sorry missed that

#682655 Ahmad Rusadi
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
24 Mar 2022 04:31:06

the old submission is wrong person

#682001 Giulio Cesare Lopes Ferriello
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
18 Mar 2022 13:06:28
By mons 18 March 2022 - 11:45 AM UTC 

Good point - I've recut it from the original source with the ensuing increase in image quality. I hadn't got round to checking it yet, but it's quite evident now that you mention it.

 

I think I've spoken to @jojokoning before to try and avoid using such tools and cut the original source images - cuts like this show why…

 

I have actually forget did i use the tools or not, i will try to avoid any image enlargement software in the future, thanks for the reminder.

#681970 Giulio Cesare Lopes Ferriello
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
18 Mar 2022 04:31:47

Did another recheck it turns out the resolution is 500x500, should i upload the 250x250 or just leave it like that @mons ?

#681864 Daniel Zabala
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
17 Mar 2022 08:32:23
By mons 17 March 2022 - 07:51 AM UTC 

Please @jojokoning, when you have a lot of images, even if they are not from the same requested pack, upload them as a pack anyway. You save the time of uploading them one-by-one and I save the time of downloading them individually too…

 

I am sorry i did not know that thing is do-able at the first place, will do on the future cut👍

#681757 Abdullah Al-Attar
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
16 Mar 2022 01:49:24
By mons 15 March 2022 - 18:37 PM UTC 

Images like this which are lacking in quality should be cut in 180x180, as having them in 250x250 only means their lack of sharpness is magnified @jojokoning 

 

A few images in this pack and some of your other recent ones are also very clearly from poor sources (not your fault, I know). In those cases, there is no need to upscale them to 250x250. If the source image is small and/or of low quality, just cut it in 180x180. There are some which are just a blurry mass of pixels, and it might be worth considering whether they're even worth cutting in the first place tbh.

 

Thanks for the feedback, I think im gonna find a new source..

#681756 Faumi Syahreza
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
16 Mar 2022 01:38:15
By mons 15 March 2022 - 18:26 PM UTC 

@jojokoning, keep an eye out for snow all around the head:

 

 

Here's a video on how to spot it and easily remove it:

 

 

Also, take care to maintain the aspect ratio when resizing images. I can't tell whether if it's the source image which was so bloated, but it seems a very unrealistic head shape. I've tried to correct it to a more realistic shape.

 

Finally, in cases like this, adding some auto-contrast and/or brightness (as applicable) will ensure the final cut looks that little bit better 😉

 

Good point, need to double check next time 👍

#681666 Yevheniy Kychun
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
15 Mar 2022 08:49:44
By mons 15 March 2022 - 07:47 AM UTC 

@jojokoning, it's good that you're moving the collar upwards, but there's no need to nudge them so far up. Having a little bit of collar on the same level of the chin or very slightly beneath it is enough, because the person otherwise looks like a hunchback 😉

 

Here's a post explaining this in more detail 👍

 

Thanks for the feedback, improving in next submission👍

#681028 Nana Priyatna
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
09 Mar 2022 04:21:37
By mons 08 March 2022 - 17:29 PM UTC 

It's likely that the source image for this cut was quite poor @jojokoning . When it's this small and lacking sharpness, do consider whether it's worth cutting in the first place, and whether its lack of quality will lead to a better 180x cut instead of 250x 😉

I think im gonna search for a new source instead doing 180x, thanks for the feedback

 

#680742 Lee Kyung-Soo
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
06 Mar 2022 13:27:12
By mons 05 March 2022 - 12:04 PM UTC 

@jojokoning, if a source is this poor, it's better if the cut is in 180x180 instead of 250x250. I believe we've also spoken about the need for all cuts to include a collar, so please ensure they all do 👍

 

sorry for not noticing that, thanks for the feedback

#680571 Amrun Mubarok
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
04 Mar 2022 15:17:09
By mons 04 March 2022 - 15:15 PM UTC 

Use photopea.com, it's a free online tool which is very similar to Photoshop. The same technique shown on the video can be utilized on it as well 👍

 

Okay thanks im gonna try it 👍

#680568 Amrun Mubarok
jojokoning
4 years ago
6 months ago
516
04 Mar 2022 15:13:54
By mons 04 March 2022 - 14:58 PM UTC 

@Kevin Mahendra, we ask for all cuts to contain a collar within no more than 2-3 pixels of the chin, and for them to be cropped no more than 2-3 pixels above the head.

 

If the source image contains a collar which is lower down than that (as seems to have been in this case), use the below technique:

 

 

I'll tweak this one myself, but please keep the above in mind for any future cuts you may do 👍

 

Thanks for the advice and sorry for not noticing that thing, btw i dont have photoshop since its too big and laggy for my laptop, for next submission is it okay to cut it like i did or just put the source image ?