Win a copy of FM24 in our Prediction League. Prizes are given out to the best predictor each month, so you have multiple chances to win.

Emerson Pedro Vanga - Submissions - Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

2000217385

Timeline

754x750
mons
17 years ago
11 hours ago
86,208

Too small to get a cut from.

 

@Ünal Burak, given you've had 16 uploads rejected, compared to just 4 accepted, perhaps it's time you started following the guidelines to uploading images if you want to keep taking part in these forums 👍

250x250
Completed by mons on 22 Oct 2023 14:47:49
Ünal Burak
3 years ago
3 months ago
25
By mons 11 October 2023 - 09:08 AM UTC 

Too small to get a cut from.

 

@Ünal Burak, given you've had 16 uploads rejected, compared to just 4 accepted, perhaps it's time you started following the guidelines to uploading images if you want to keep taking part in these forums 👍

 

Thanks for your feedback. I would like you to enlighten me on something I'm curious about. My source was rejected on the grounds that the resulting photo would have low pixels and was too small to be cut. However, how appropriate is the pixel quality of the final photo, which appears to be completed and accepted, for the game? And according to what criteria was it accepted?

mons
17 years ago
11 hours ago
86,208
By Ünal Burak 04 November 2023 - 19:45 PM UTC 

Thanks for your feedback. I would like you to enlighten me on something I'm curious about. My source was rejected on the grounds that the resulting photo would have low pixels and was too small to be cut. However, how appropriate is the pixel quality of the final photo, which appears to be completed and accepted, for the game? And according to what criteria was it accepted?

 

Because I said so, in both cases. Because your source was much too small to be worth cutting, and it'd have produced a terrible cut. And because the newer cut, while not exactly ideal either, is still superior.

 

And if you genuinely don't see that, I don't think you belong here, frankly. But you're just shit-stirring 😉

Ünal Burak
3 years ago
3 months ago
25

I'm not making a mess. What I want to point out is that, as you said yourself, you are endorsing a source that is inadequate just because it is better than the other. Since you are examining it meticulously, do not make contradictory statements. Expressions such as "You have no business here" are not nice at all. If you do not see the obvious mistake, the accusation you made to me will be valid for you...