Ferdi Kadıoğlu - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
37060600
Background and Stadium Packs
Submitted
07 Jul 2024 17:40:28
Timeline
There's nothing wrong with current MP image.
This image is part of a pack:
N.E.C. (FM17 in-game cuts) [Old Request Response]
This image is a response to
#174337
This image is a response to
#192084
This image is a response to
#211771
Current one is 250x HQ cut without any real difference to be improved.
Current one is 250x HQ cut without any real difference to be improved.
It’s not high quality at all it’s blurry. I’ve seen way better graphics updated that didn’t need it yet you’ll reject this. Very poor
It’s not high quality at all it’s blurry. I’ve seen way better graphics updated that didn’t need it yet you’ll reject this. Very poor
To amplify on what Baja said, the existing megapack cut is already of a good enough quality and is quite recent. In cases like this, there is no need for a new cut to be made, especially when there is hardly any difference between the existing cut and the source provided.
In fact, the last point in the guidelines on how to make requests says: "Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative." for this very reason. Keep in mind that we have a somewhat limited amount of cutters and if they have to make a new cut for every new source which comes out, we'd have an even bigger request list than we already do. There's a difference between images being cut and being requested. If a source is cut, then of course I'll check whether it's better than the existing megapack. I'd much rather that our cutters spend their time on genuine improvements or missing images rather than sources like this which are very similar to existing MP images.
That said, if somebody nonetheless cuts it, I'll of course give it due consideration when deciding whether to add it to the megapack or not, but imo it's not really a priority when you keep all of the above in mind.
Your cut isn't much better though, so Baja's points still stands. And I'm not sure I like your sense of entitlement. We're not here to service your particular needs, you know.
To amplify on what Baja said, the existing megapack cut is already of a good enough quality and is quite recent. In cases like this, there is no need for a new cut to be made, especially when there is hardly any difference between the existing cut and the source provided.
In fact, the last point in the guidelines on how to make requests says: "Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative." for this very reason. Keep in mind that we have a somewhat limited amount of cutters and if they have to make a new cut for every new source which comes out, we'd have an even bigger request list than we already do. There's a difference between images being cut and being requested. If a source is cut, then of course I'll check whether it's better than the existing megapack. I'd much rather that our cutters spend their time on genuine improvements or missing images rather than sources like this which are very similar to existing MP images.
That said, if somebody nonetheless cuts it, I'll of course give it due consideration when deciding whether to add it to the megapack or not, but imo it's not really a priority when you keep all of the above in mind.
Your cut isn't much better though, so Baja's points still stands. And I'm not sure I like your sense of entitlement. We're not here to service your particular needs, you know.
Thanks
This image is a response to
#211940
This image is part of a pack:
N.E.C. Nijmegen [Old Request]
This image is a response to
#225057
This image is part of a pack:
Fenerbahce SK [Old Request Response]
This image is a response to
#281629
This image is part of a pack:
Fenerbahçe
Pending
by OmerKagan2020
on 06 Dec 2020 09:08:54
Completed
by mons
on 06 Dec 2020 09:26:04
Completed
by mons
on 24 Oct 2021 15:22:33
Don't know which one is more recent