@mons Do you really think this will be an improvement?

@mons Do you really think this will be an improvement?

To be honest, I'm not entirely 100% sure, but the older source was produced from a much lower-resolution image and is quite a bit older than the source I've requested. I'll rely on your good judgement - if it's a hard source to cut and if you think any improvements are marginal, then I'll reject it, no problemo.

Best I could do.

As great a cut as usual

Good cut but that's not an improvement.
@Mr_Orry

Great work! I'll go at it!

@mons why didn't you put new version wich is million times better than new\current?!

Because it's from 2014/15, which is even older than the previous MP image.

Yes mate,but still looks million times better than current,and also source above is from this year and if you compare those two,there are no much difference between them.

I'm not going to put a 3-year-old cut when there's a perfectly acceptable cut available which is much more recent than that - I just don't see the point.

I simply can't look at that crap source cut,so here's the more recent cut.