Jessy Deminguet - Submissions - Cut Out Player Faces Megapack
85144985
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
The third one isn't from the most ideal source, and isn't looking at the camera. Please @77david54, I again urge you to use your time more productively by avoiding cutting sources which won't be making it into the megapack. In the time it took you to do that cut, you could have done another one which will be going into the MP 😉
The third one isn't from the most ideal source, and isn't looking at the camera. Please @77david54, I again urge you to use your time more productively by avoiding cutting sources which won't be making it into the megapack. In the time it took you to do that cut, you could have done another one which will be going into the MP 😉
I think you will put the first in the megapack but personally i think the second is better. I did not erase the little snow from the second because i will not waste my time. I don't like the first source , it looks like a photo reconstructed on photoshop. And i don't like to go up the collar , it doesn't look natural and i always take it too high. For the third , i now know that a player who sweats , it is not worth cutting.
I think you will put the first in the megapack but personally i think the second is better. I did not erase the little snow from the second because i will not waste my time. I don't like the first source , it looks like a photo reconstructed on photoshop. And i don't like to go up the collar , it doesn't look natural and i always take it too high. For the third , i now know that a player who sweats , it is not worth cutting.
Can you elaborate on “I don't like the first source , it looks like a photo reconstructed on photoshop”? The exposure of the photo (and the other SM Caen player photos) is a bit too bright in my opinion but otherwise it's completely fine.
The second is blurry compared to the first - screencaps of a video are generally inferior to professional-quality photoshoots.
For the third, it's not necessarily that he is sweating, but because he is looking away from the camera. “Action shots” of players during matches are to be avoided wherever possible because of this reason, as well as that they are likely to be blurry, because the player is in motion and the photographer has to take the photo quickly instead of having time to get a sharp focus in the image.
Can you elaborate on “I don't like the first source , it looks like a photo reconstructed on photoshop”? The exposure of the photo (and the other SM Caen player photos) is a bit too bright in my opinion but otherwise it's completely fine.
The second is blurry compared to the first - screencaps of a video are generally inferior to professional-quality photoshoots.
For the third, it's not necessarily that he is sweating, but because he is looking away from the camera. “Action shots” of players during matches are to be avoided wherever possible because of this reason, as well as that they are likely to be blurry, because the player is in motion and the photographer has to take the photo quickly instead of having time to get a sharp focus in the image.
I agree with almost everything you said. For the sources of the Caen pack , it depends on the players , most give a very good result , but some are less successful in my opinion , sometimes my fault because i went up too much the collar.
The second is a bit blurry but it's really very light. It's not the sceencaps the problem , it's the movement in the video that makes it a bit blurry but you already know that. I did some screencaps when the person is still , it doesn't blur at all.
In the first , it is especially the raised collar which spoils the quality a little in my opinion and the second is newer and more natural too. I liked the third one which is the most recent but the angle , the player's gaze and the sweat spoil everything.
Truelsen_