George Moncur - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
28047880
Background and Stadium Packs
Submitted
05 Nov 2023 22:11:25
Timeline
This image is part of a pack:
Barnsley [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
Barnsley FC [Old Request]
This image is a response to
#170716
Found this source instead:
Ok thanks, I understand that.
This image is part of a pack:
Barnsley [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
Barnsley [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
Luton Town [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
Luton Town [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
Luton Town
This image is part of a pack:
Hull City
This image is part of a pack:
Leyton Orient - various
Pending
by Kristoffer2409
on 30 Dec 2022 09:13:34
Completed
by mons
on 30 Dec 2022 09:33:12
This image is part of a pack:
Leyton Orient 23/24
Pending
by deanstokes96
on 22 Oct 2023 21:48:42
Completed
by mons
on 23 Oct 2023 05:25:22
This image is part of a pack:
Kings Lynn and Southend United
A lot of these aren't large enough to provide improvements @KeyR1
A lot of these aren't large enough to provide improvements @KeyR1
Ah apologies, can't seem to get any “good” newer pics of Southend at all. Was best I could find.
How is this? If this is okay, I'll get on with redoing the others
Ah apologies, can't seem to get any “good” newer pics of Southend at all. Was best I could find.
How is this? If this is okay, I'll get on with redoing the others
It's not bad, but I'm not sure it's really necessary. I refer you to the guidelines for uploading images:
- If you are requesting an image for a person who already has a cut in the megapack, please make sure that the source you are uploading will produce an improvement. We don't consider a newer image to be automatically an improvement since we also take quality of source and cut into consideration. If the current megapack cut is recent and similar in look (check on his/her timeline before uploading an image), there is little added value in cutting another source for the person. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative. Please keep in mind that we have a limited number of cutters and hundreds of thousands of images in the megapack, so we can't update them every few months or so.
It's not bad, but I'm not sure it's really necessary. I refer you to the guidelines for uploading images:
- If you are requesting an image for a person who already has a cut in the megapack, please make sure that the source you are uploading will produce an improvement. We don't consider a newer image to be automatically an improvement since we also take quality of source and cut into consideration. If the current megapack cut is recent and similar in look (check on his/her timeline before uploading an image), there is little added value in cutting another source for the person. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative. Please keep in mind that we have a limited number of cutters and hundreds of thousands of images in the megapack, so we can't update them every few months or so.
Makes perfect sense
and valid point taken on board.
Cheers for all the hard work
mons