Quincy Promes - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack

168235

Timeline

250x250
Rejected by mons on 04 Jan 2023 18:07:34
1141x1280
In Progress by Deleted User #1094108 on 04 Jan 2023 17:54:01
Completed by Deleted User #1094108 on 04 Jan 2023 17:56:23
1242x2208
This image is a response to #2474011
Rejected by Deleted User #1094108 on 04 Jan 2023 20:44:42
Nobelix78
4 years ago
1 year ago
37

You have an old photo of the player, on the one that I offered you a new one. Why reject what is relevant now, and not yesterday?

mons
18 years ago
1 hour ago
90,977
By Nobelix78 04 January 2023 - 20:55 PM UTC 

You have an old photo of the player, on the one that I offered you a new one. Why reject what is relevant now, and not yesterday?

 

From the guidelines:

 

  • If you are requesting an image for a person who already has a cut in the megapack, please make sure that the source you are uploading will produce an improvement. We don't consider a newer image to be automatically an improvement since we also take quality of source and cut into consideration. If the current megapack cut is recent and similar in look (check on his/her timeline before uploading an image), there is little added value in cutting another source for the person. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative. Please keep in mind that we have a limited number of cutters and hundreds of thousands of images in the megapack, so we can't update them every few months or so.

 

Besides, a cut was produced yesterday of him already.

250x250
This image is part of a pack: MF 4
Pending by OKV on 08 Jan 2023 15:55:00
Completed by mons on 08 Jan 2023 16:02:24
Rejected by mons on 08 Jan 2023 16:02:29