Maxim Dekker - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack

2000014084

Timeline

667x1000
250x250
Rejected by mons on 23 Dec 2020 17:45:51
mons
18 years ago
4 minutes ago
91,503
Good work again @massimodebortoli97, but with a source this good and easy to cut, there's no reason to leave such a large empty space above the head. 2-3 pixels is enough, so that the available area is maximised 👍
801x1200
mons
18 years ago
4 minutes ago
91,503

Virtually identical to the current cut, which is recent and of a very good quality, so there's no need for this to be cut again.

250x250
Completed by mons on 27 Aug 2021 16:57:54
Maxdestroyer666
5 years ago
10 hours ago
452
Premium
By mons 26 August 2021 - 21:03 PM UTC 

Virtually identical to the current cut, which is recent and of a very good quality, so there's no need for this to be cut again.

 

I have to disagree, in my opinion the last source uploaded have a better illumination.

mons
18 years ago
4 minutes ago
91,503
By massimodebortoli97 27 August 2021 - 16:52 PM UTC 

I have to disagree, in my opinion the last source uploaded have a better illumination.

 

Maybe that's the case, sure, but the current cut is still recent and of a very good quality. Now that you've cut it, of course I'll take it into consideration, but there wasn't any need to cut it again. 

 

I never said the new source is a bad one, just that it's not strictly necessary. It's always nice to have more recent images, but we can't be cutting images for every player every few months, it's just not sensible.

Maxdestroyer666
5 years ago
10 hours ago
452
Premium
By mons 27 August 2021 - 17:00 PM UTC 

Maybe that's the case, sure, but the current cut is still recent and of a very good quality. Now that you've cut it, of course I'll take it into consideration, but there wasn't any need to cut it again. 

 

I never said the new source is a bad one, just that it's not strictly necessary. It's always nice to have more recent images, but we can't be cutting images for every player every few months, it's just not sensible.

 

i'm sorry i didn't mean to belittle your work, i know that is a hard work.

mons
18 years ago
4 minutes ago
91,503
By massimodebortoli97 27 August 2021 - 17:17 PM UTC 

i'm sorry i didn't mean to belittle your work, i know that is a hard work.

 

No, no, I didn't think you were belittling me, no offence taken by me and none caused either, I hope!

 

I just wanted to explain why it's not considered an improvement in order to either (a) give you cause to reconsider similar requests in the future or (b) cutting them yourself 😉

 

I'm always happy to get new cuts, and this one is perfectly fine, but I don't like our cutters to be given unnecessary work 🙂

800x1200
This image is part of a pack: AZ
Pending by Deleted User #1094108 on 21 Jul 2022 19:52:44
In Progress by Deleted User #1094108 on 21 Jul 2022 19:52:51
Completed by Maxdestroyer666 on 22 Jul 2022 16:25:34
250x250
This image is a response to #2325087
Completed by mons on 22 Jul 2022 16:31:50
250x250
This image is part of a pack: AZ
Completed by Deleted User #1094108 on 23 Jul 2022 13:07:26
667x1000
250x250
This image is part of a pack: AZ
Pending by cksrl1000 on 31 Aug 2023 12:37:50
Completed by mons on 31 Aug 2023 14:08:26
250x250
Completed on 04 Dec 2024 08:54:44
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Feyenoord #1
Pending by KOCIE on 02 Nov 2024 10:30:38
Completed by mons on 02 Nov 2024 10:47:05