Marcel Sabitzer - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack

16045721

Timeline

Tyko Morales
15 years ago
1 month ago
248
would be better if u send me a pm telling i forbidden to request anything cause everything i request even if it is an excelent quality image, from your beloved getty images its rejected
Baja
14 years ago
3 days ago
35,851
Problem is that you obviously don't understand what means an improvement.If this is excelent quality image,I'm Marcel Sabitzer in personal.Quality is solid,but it can be a lot better.Also this source could never give us better image than current MP photo.So that's the reason to reject this request and most you've made before.
Here is the spoiler to learn what means an improvement.
Improvement Guide.
This guide will take you to various types of cut-outs and how they can be improved. When you want to have a cut-out improved, please be sure to request properly (link to request guide) and that the improvement you ask is as good as possible
A + means a positive thing about the cut, a - a negative
Type 1
http://localhostr.com/file/ydztHPP/messi_1.png
+Might be the only alternative for an unknown player
-Not a profile picture
-Low quality
-Poorly cut
Can be improved by:
*Every image that looks better
--------------------------------
Type 2
http://localhostr.com/file/pMTW0Dd/messi_2.png
+Good quality
+Cut as good as possible
-Not a profile picture
Can be improved by:
*Decent quality or slightly lesser quality profile picture
---------------------------------
Type 3
http://localhostr.com/file/69reePf/messi_2_5.png
+Good profile picture
+Cut as good as possible
-Low quality
Can be improved by:
*Profile picture with higher quality
---------------------------------------
Type 4
http://localhostr.com/file/Ym2byYC/messi_3.png
+Good profile picture
+Cut as good as possible
+High quality
-Old hairstyle
Can be improved by:
*A newer picture with the same high quality
(NOTE: Most top players will get a yearly cut-out, but they actually don't deserve it. Only ask to replace this kind of image if their appearance really changed, like this example)
------------------------------------------
Type 5
http://localhostr.com/file/RyHsHGv/messi_4.png
+Good profile picture
+Cut as good as possible
+High quality
+Newest picture available
Can be improved by:
*Nothing, probably the picture for a future season
-------------------------------------------
Type 0
http://localhostr.com/file/dmRZQ0I/1.pnghttp://localhostr.com/file/PLrgWqM/2.pnghttp://localhostr.com/file/84qe9ti/messi_4 2.pnghttp://localhostr.com/file/77v2223/messi_4 4.pnghttp://localhostr.com/file/3DjPEmw/messi_4.png
-Bad cuts (white spots in the hair, white spots, box around the image, no straight on cut, bad edges, too much lighting,...)
Can be improved by:
*The same or a better source image
*Request the bad image for somebody to clean up
mons
18 years ago
2 hours ago
91,542
I'm sorry but in all 3 cases, the source requested is actually smaller than the existing megapack cut which is of a better quality.

Please try and understand what constitutes an improvement. These kind of sources are the precise reason why the bottom two guidelines are included when making a request:

Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality.
Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative.
AlexYNWA92
8 years ago
1 month ago
323
I'm sorry but in all 3 cases, the source requested is actually smaller than the existing megapack cut which is of a better quality.

Please try and understand what constitutes an improvement. These kind of sources are the precise reason why the bottom two guidelines are included when making a request:

Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality.
Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative.



Okey didn't know that the picture was to small. Regarding to the other things, everything is opinion based and i respect your opinion. I think all 3 are a improvement. And Nkunku that also was from the Bundesliga website. He looks very good in game i think with the new cut. I really want the Leipzig players cut-out from the Bundesliga website, so i can pay someone thru paypal if they want to help me.

https://gyazo.com/5a2e152421e89e5a7980b152547279be
mons
18 years ago
2 hours ago
91,542
Okey didn't know that the picture was to small. Regarding to the other things, everything is opinion based and i respect your opinion. I think all 3 are a improvement. And Nkunku that also was from the Bundesliga website. He looks very good in game i think with the new cut. I really want the Leipzig players cut-out from the Bundesliga website, so i can pay someone thru paypal if they want to help me.

https://gyazo.com/5a2e152421e89e5a7980b152547279be

I appreciate your enthusiasm but this website is not intended as a personal cut-out service, but to improve the megapack.

Since:
a) we don't consider newer images as automatic improvements, and
b) cutting such requests would mean that cutters' valuable time is being diverted from more pressing requests,
the decision was taken long ago that these kind of requests are not considered improvements.

That said, if somebody cut them, I would assess them on their own merits and decide whether they are better cuts than the ones presently in the megapack.

Finally, there's really no need to ask for payment. You can do it all yourself for free using the programs, tools and guidelines in this thread. You'd be surprised how easily and quickly you can cut images yourself
AlexYNWA92
8 years ago
1 month ago
323
I appreciate your enthusiasm but this website is not intended as a personal cut-out service, but to improve the megapack.

Since:
a) we don't consider newer images as automatic improvements, and
b) cutting such requests would mean that cutters' valuable time is being diverted from more pressing requests,
the decision was taken long ago that these kind of requests are not considered improvements.

That said, if somebody cut them, I would assess them on their own merits and decide whether they are better cuts than the ones presently in the megapack.

Finally, there's really no need to ask for payment. You can do it all yourself for free using the programs, tools and guidelines in this thread. You'd be surprised how easily and quickly you can cut images yourself


I did the cuts myself and it went alright i think. Will stick to transparent picks only because that was not so hard