Trent Alexander-Arnold - Submissions - Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

28104124

Timeline

250x250
mons
17 years ago
7 hours ago
85,886

A new image for this player has been cut already, so he doesn't need to be cut again and this source is not large enough to be worth cutting either @Adilson Angel Abreu de Almeida Gomes 

 

This is a classic example of what we mean when we specify that a newer image doesn't mean it's necessarily an improvement. Please do not request these kind of images again. Besides, for high-profile players like this one, high-quality images are available, or will be available soon, so there's little point in cutting these kind of smaller images - it's a waste of your time requesting them, as they will just be rejected.

250x250
This image is part of a pack: Liverpool
Pending by HRiddick on 27 Sep 2021 21:59:49
Completed by mons on 28 Sep 2021 05:54:02
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Liverpool CL Images
Pending by JasonLFC10 on 20 May 2022 10:13:42
Rejected by mons on 20 May 2022 10:41:02
1365x2048
In Progress by mons on 12 Jun 2022 13:48:16
Completed by mons on 12 Jun 2022 13:53:29
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Request mixpack
Completed by mons on 12 Jun 2022 13:53:29
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Liverpool F.C. - Champions League Final - Photo Session
Pending by MathiasKP on 15 Jun 2022 09:29:09
Completed by krissmed on 15 Jun 2022 11:14:01
Deleted Account #1094108

@MathiasKP Good work, but it's worth marking a source as ‘in progress' before cutting, to make sure people know you are doing them and prevent duplicate work. As now there are 4 or 5 in this pack that have already been done unfortunately.

mons
17 years ago
7 hours ago
85,886

@MathiasKP, I remind you to rotate your source images before cutting them, as suggested earlier. Compare your cut to the newly-added cut, for a practical example. Yours is perfectly fine, but the non-tilted one looks a fair bit better in-game 👍

 

Further to the above, I also ask you to put some thought into which images you cut. Before adding an image to the megapack, I compare it with the existing cut-out to see if it is an improvement. A newer cut is not automatically an improvement, since quality of the cut-out is also taken into consideration, including lighting, hair details, orientation etc. High-profile players at high-profile teams will invariably have a recent high-quality cut in the megapack, so a lot of the present Arsenal cut-outs don't really need to be replaced, for example. In fact, due to this, only a handful were added in yesterday's update pack and I suspect that only a handful from this pack will be added too, for the same reason 😢

 

I always think it's a pity when cutters spend their time on images which might be unlikely to be added to the megapack, which is why I'm mentioning it now. To be clear, I'm not saying that there's much wrong with the cuts themselves, just that I feel the present ones are slightly better.

1603x2048
This image is part of a pack: Liverpool FC
Pending by Deleted User #1094108 on 12 Aug 2022 15:18:35
In Progress by Deleted User #1094108 on 12 Aug 2022 15:19:50
Completed by Deleted User #1094108 on 12 Aug 2022 17:56:45
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Mixpack
Completed by Deleted User #1094108 on 12 Aug 2022 17:56:45
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Liverpool FC
Completed by HRiddick on 19 Sep 2022 11:52:06
2333x3500
This image is part of a pack: England - World Cup 2022
Pending by geordie1981 on 18 Nov 2022 12:25:34
In Progress by geordie1981 on 18 Nov 2022 12:25:39
Completed by geordie1981 on 18 Nov 2022 17:12:16
250x250
This image is part of a pack: England - World Cup 2022
Completed by geordie1981 on 18 Nov 2022 17:12:16
500x500
250x250