Trent Alexander-Arnold - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
28104124
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
@MathiasKP Good work, but it's worth marking a source as âin progress' before cutting, to make sure people know you are doing them and prevent duplicate work. As now there are 4 or 5 in this pack that have already been done unfortunately.
@MathiasKP, I remind you to rotate your source images before cutting them, as suggested earlier. Compare your cut to the newly-added cut, for a practical example. Yours is perfectly fine, but the non-tilted one looks a fair bit better in-game đ
Further to the above, I also ask you to put some thought into which images you cut. Before adding an image to the megapack, I compare it with the existing cut-out to see if it is an improvement. A newer cut is not automatically an improvement, since quality of the cut-out is also taken into consideration, including lighting, hair details, orientation etc. High-profile players at high-profile teams will invariably have a recent high-quality cut in the megapack, so a lot of the present Arsenal cut-outs don't really need to be replaced, for example. In fact, due to this, only a handful were added in yesterday's update pack and I suspect that only a handful from this pack will be added too, for the same reason đą
I always think it's a pity when cutters spend their time on images which might be unlikely to be added to the megapack, which is why I'm mentioning it now. To be clear, I'm not saying that there's much wrong with the cuts themselves, just that I feel the present ones are slightly better.
A new image for this player has been cut already, so he doesn't need to be cut again and this source is not large enough to be worth cutting either @Adilson Angel Abreu de Almeida Gomes
This is a classic example of what we mean when we specify that a newer image doesn't mean it's necessarily an improvement. Please do not request these kind of images again. Besides, for high-profile players like this one, high-quality images are available, or will be available soon, so there's little point in cutting these kind of smaller images - it's a waste of your time requesting them, as they will just be rejected.