FM 2021 FLUT skin dark - Version 16.0

UK ISP blocks this site but here is an alternative link

https://mega.nz/file/wUMDXS4Z#1PBM4nApFK5eP1fmRbLQin3N-94Z7CX_ltwZS121c4k

legend, thanks-have a great weekend of sport

@ Rosek

It is possible to become the final version in 2560 x 1440 in near future? 😇

for me, the normal Version works fine in my 2560 x 1440 Screen/Monitor

*everytime i use the special 2560 x 1440 Version - not all is fine, like with normal Version

🙂

I can't confirm at all, it must be due to your configuration.

so when I always pasted the document (copy skin folder to skins folder) for example jersey back number proportions were wrong and so on.

When I used the normal document, these problems were not present.

edit. 

+ i used V16 - so wqhd Version V16 is not released, so i can not test, if that V16 wqhd works fine, now, for me

🙂

Greetings from Germany

🙂

I can confirm this. Never really got the special version to fit at all, something always seems to be off and scaled wrong. 

To me, is the normal version with 125% zoom, by far and large the best option for 1440 screen.

for me too, my Friend @RellomQ 

Greetings to your lovely Danish

I would find it interesting to see who Fluts disciples support in the football world

me-Leeds United with a soft spot for York City

As I believe you already know lol: FC Porto (from Spain I like Barcelona; from England, Man City and Liverpool)

Yep, I got Porto, decent choice

we just signed Firpo from Barca and Harrison from city

Instead of complaining now, it would have been better for the errors to be reported via screenshot so that the creator can fix them. To suddenly announce that the WQHD version would never fit is absolute nonsense.

Oh, indeed! Thanks for all the assistance @flut 

I was not complaining, more so giving my opinion on the matter. I'm not sure with what mindset Flut created the 1440p edition, but to me is it worse then the 1080p. Oh, and sure let me show you, and explain why I believe so. 

First off, I'm an old man (not really,) but I like to be able to see the text I'm playing with. That mean playing with 100% zoom on any sort of skin, is out of the question unless I played on a 24 inch 1080p screen. Since that is not the case, and I play on a 32 inch 1440p screen, I tend to zoom in. 

Alright, so lets look at profiles. This is 1080p version, with 125% zoom, which is what I normal use.

Show Spoiler

1080p 125% profile

Let's us compare that to 1440p with 125% zoom:

Show Spoiler

1440p 125% profile

I'm aware that the kits, would be an easy fix, so look past that. The scaling was clearly not intended with 1440p skin, as the boxes are very small, or way to big. Okay, so lets take a look at 110% zoom with the 1440p skin just for the sake of it.

Show Spoiler

1440p 110% profile

A little better, but to me, is the boxes still to small, or to big with wasted space, here on 110% zoom. Also, much of the text is getting a little small imo. Like I said, I like 125% zoom on a big screen. And finally, lets see it on 100% zoom like it was most likely intended to be used.

Show Spoiler

1440 100% profile

Right, so this might look sort of okay on a screenshot, but I can't read the text. Simple as that, and I also don't like the massives amounts of wasted space in the boxes, specially around the attribute box. This is all opinion, and mine is, that 1080p with 125% is by far an large the best when it come to the player profile.

Moving on to the home overview. Again, starting with 1080p 125% zoom.

Show Spoiler

1080p 125% Home 

Compared to 1440p with 125%, followed by 110% and 100%

Show Spoiler

1440p 125% home

Show Spoiler

1440p 110% home

Show Spoiler

1440p 100% home

A lot less scaling problems here on the Home overview screen, and the obvious difference to the managers bar is duo to changes between 1440p v14 and 1080p v16 … so this is a case, would it not really matter what version I used. On the other hand, let us take a quick look at the club screen with only 1440p 125% zoom and 1080p 125% zoom.

Show Spoiler

1080p 125% Club

Show Spoiler

1440p 125% club

The scaling problem with the numbers on the “last starting 11," only appers here on 125% zoom, and not on 110% and 100%

Alright, so I went on and took screenshots of pretty much all the different overviews and windows. Most of them are very similar to each other, when I compare 1440p and 1080p with 125% zoom.  Where I see the biggest problem with 1440p, is on the player window. Now, anyone could argue that the 1440p skin should be played on 100% zoom, and it would all be perfectly fine. Sure, but I can't see or read anything with that zoom … Like I said, this was never a problem to me, as the 1080p version is pretty much perfect on 125% zoom. 

Honestly, I'm just happy to have a skin that are so far and beyond better then the standard (purple,) hellish biblically side show, SI made. 

The 2560 x 1440 version can only be played with 100% zoom. But we have the greater resolution in order to have more space.
The fact that you cannot read this correctly is not a fault of the skin.

Therefore, your blanket statement from the previous post bothers me that something always did not fit with the WQHD version and would be wrong. Because that's not true.

With 100% zoom everything is fine. Nobody can do anything about the fact that you cannot read this, but you cannot blame the WQHD version for that and make a general statement that something would always be wrong with it.

So an skin, that should be optimized for 1440p, can only be played with 100% zoom?

Right, completely pointless then. Why would I want more “space” over being able to read and see what is in the boxes? 

This makes no sense to me, and is the direct opposite of optimizing a skin for a given resolution imo. 

Hi  Mag1lc2 and Rellom Q.

I took a look at your debate and I believe both are right.

On one hand, as Magg1lc2 said, and considering the opinion of the people who use it (I didn't test it in my PC), the version adapted by Rosek works well in 1440p, 100%  zoom. May be (I don't know, but I believe so) it can be optimised in order to use a little bit better the space of the content in some boxes. However, it should be noted that it was the first time that Rosek edit a skin. He put lots of effort and did a great work in the skin for that specific resolution (even if, as I said, some boxes could be optimised). That's why I, and, I believe, the users of FlutSkin should be recognized to Rosek. And it also should be noted that Rosek always is receptive to feedback and suggestions, and always tried to improve his version based on that feedback/suggestions (that's why, I believe, Mag1lc2 did his first comment responding to Rellom Q comment).

On other hand, is true when Rellom Q refer that a skin should be edited in order to support several screen resolutions. However, as you can see, despite the original skin works well in 1440p 125% zoom (which is great to know) I also did it for a specific resolution (that's why Rosek decided to do his adapted version for 1440p). Of course you always can ask why I did it for a specific resolution. The answer is easy: 1. the work to do a skin for different resolutions is hard, since for all stuff works well, besides the work to adjust some panels and boxes, we have to use the priority codification (the code responsible for “give the instructions” regarding what panels should be displayed in each resolution, since, for example, in small resolutions only some panels can be displayed) which implies many tests - thus it requires much more free time to work on the skin;  2. in spite of editing FlutSkin for many years, I'm not a programming expert either and, then, I'm not sure if I can do a skin which completely works well in various resolutions (since I don't like when only some panels work well). 

So…in the end, the good news, and the most important thing, is that both of you, with different versions and zooms, play FM with the skin working well 🙂

cheers

Here here, we must remember that no other skin gets such dedicated support from the creator, we should all be thankful to Flut and Roses for the tremendous work

i just can’t imagine playing the game without the skin, in fact I don’t buy it until Flut has done his first version

True words mate! 👍

@flut A huge Thank you to you for this message. You said all.

Dear all

I just finished to include the link for download the FlutSkin v16 adapted by Rosek for 2560x1440, 100% Zoom!!

Once again, thank you my friend!!!

See you (I hope) in FM22!!!

Thanks for the best skin again Flut. Have a great summer, good luck to Porto

Thanks!!

and good luck also to Leeds United!!!  🙂 🙂

Thanks for so much hard work Flut. Really, really appreciated. 

If I could ask one more thing it would be that you change the name that appears on the paypal account so I can donate without having to explain what “Flut Skin” is…….. 😂

Thanks, but sorry, the wqhd Version, for me, not optimal. many menue Positions are wrong…sorry

i go back to normal V16 Version and then with Zoom 110 %

= that works in my Case better….

Edit: here: Example of something wrong.

Zoom 110 %  - because with 100 % Zoom ( is the text sooooo small)

you can see: something in Kits Menue wrong.

down no full menues showing..

*the dark/grey Background colour is my own picture, what i include in backgrounds Folder…

Thank for helping!

• Edit: one Question: when my Players scores a goal, the menue comes, with his name, but not showing his Player Photo…can we Fix that, to see this Face in the Goals Scored Menue?

Das wurde hier schon 1000000 Mal erwähnt, dass man nur mit Icons in der Seitenleiste spielen soll, und nicht mit voller Seitenleiste, Das trifft übrigens auch auf den normalen Flut Skin zu.

Das steht auch dick und fett auf der ersten Seite im ersten Post, etwa im unteren Drittel:

Resolution requirements:
This skin was made to work properly in 3840x2160 (4K with windows display settings 200%) and also 1920x1080 (1080p) full screen mode, sidebar icons only. As a result, some panels won’t work properly in other resolutions.

Nochmal: Ich bin seit einigen Versionen Beta Tester der WQHD Version, und spiele zig Stunden damit, bevor sie released wird. SIE HAT KEINE FEHLER!

Der “Fehler” sitzt meistens 30cm vor dem Monitor.

Sorry for writing in my native language german (Mr. Old School is an german user), but I can´t believe that some users furthermore think, the WQHD Version has mistakes.

sidebar icons only = i do not like that: Icons only

*but okay, i set them now in the Settings, then test one more time the wqhd adapted Version.

Zoom 100 %, Full Screen (2560 * 1440)
= same result: Player Overview: kits showing wrong ( and yes, i delete Cache and reload Skin first)

+ same result: Infos down under, the boxes not really fine…

** with normal V 16 Skin Verion both Errors “not”, so - why did you not believe in our Words..

Good Night

.)

Hi Flut,

I am having some issues with the red home kit, it just doesn't display for some reason in the match screen. Any reason why it won't display (it displays everywhere else (I use Aa_season 20_21 FC kits as well). Thanks.

That is the issue with English teams in Europe, you need the in game editor and go in and remove kits used for Europe and refresh the skin and they will appear

Hi, 

I was wondering how you can move the players surname up? I was going into panals then generic and then into kit icon 14 and then under name of player adjust the numbers to suit. Whatever numbers I change the position of the surname doesn't change. I know in earlier versions of the skin the surname would move.