Jarell Quansah - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack

28127161

Timeline

250x250
Completed by mons on 05 Sep 2021 12:07:57
250x250
This image is part of a pack: England EURO U19
Pending by bakizp on 21 Jun 2022 21:49:57
Completed by weeniehutjr on 21 Jun 2022 21:53:07
Deleted Account #1094108

@bakizp Do you use an image enlarger for these?

bakizp
18 years ago
8 hours ago
23,721
By BramNUFC 22 June 2022 - 10:45 AM UTC 

@bakizp Do you use an image enlarger for these?

Yeah,Topaz Gigapixel AI.

The latest version (6.1.0) introduced massive improvement in face details.

 

Deleted Account #1094108
By bakizp 22 June 2022 - 13:40 PM UTC 

Yeah,Topaz Gigapixel AI.

The latest version (6.1.0) introduced massive improvement in face details.

 

Hmm ok, but I think the original sources are big enough for a 250x250 already? @mons Wouldn't it be better to just leave them untouched then? It looks a bit unnatural imo

bakizp
18 years ago
8 hours ago
23,721
By BramNUFC 22 June 2022 - 13:50 PM UTC 

Hmm ok, but I think the original sources are big enough for a 250x250 already? @mons Wouldn't it be better to just leave them untouched then? It looks a bit unnatural imo

I'm showing you original image,cut without any interventions and cut from my pack.

Compare them and tell me what's unnatural,please.

I've used only a bit of Vibrance since all Uefa photos are bland.

 

weeniehutjr
6 years ago
13 hours ago
5,229
By BramNUFC 22 June 2022 - 13:50 PM UTC 

Hmm ok, but I think the original sources are big enough for a 250x250 already? @mons Wouldn't it be better to just leave them untouched then? It looks a bit unnatural imo

 

I agree with @bakzip here, the cutout pack looks fine to me - this is a case where the use of AI upscaling is useful, as by going from (e.g.) a face height of 220px to 250px there's not too much for the AI to “guess” what should be in a certain pixel and you still get improved sharpness/definition compared to upscaling in Photoshop.

bakizp
18 years ago
8 hours ago
23,721

@BramNUFC  @weeniehutjr 

Check this article which shows significant improvements to the software.

This is not some Instagram toy 😉

mons
18 years ago
3 hours ago
91,786
By BramNUFC 22 June 2022 - 13:50 PM UTC 

Hmm ok, but I think the original sources are big enough for a 250x250 already? @mons Wouldn't it be better to just leave them untouched then? It looks a bit unnatural imo

 

As a rule of thumb, I'm not a big fan of upscaling software when the output is visibly hazy and prefer to use the original source. Happily, this is not one of those cases and the cut produced is of a very good quality, sharp and with no real visible blur 🙂

2333x3500
This image is part of a pack: England U20 2023
Pending by RT7 on 23 May 2023 11:48:50
In Progress by Zangor on 23 May 2023 16:54:13
Completed by Zangor on 24 May 2023 01:42:16
250x250
This image is part of a pack: England U20 World Cup
Completed by Zangor on 24 May 2023 01:42:16
250x250
Completed on 11 Oct 2023 22:30:59
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Liverpool
Completed by HRiddick on 01 Oct 2023 10:54:23
250x250
Completed on 15 Apr 2024 08:57:51
250x250
Rejected by mons on 03 Apr 2024 05:08:44
mons
18 years ago
3 hours ago
91,786

Again @owusu26, no collar. If you're going to keep uploading cuts, the least you could do is listen to feedback and follow the guidelines.

250x250
Completed on 01 Sep 2024 22:23:39
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Liverpool 24/25
Pending by Dennis Bormann on 30 Aug 2024 01:04:23
Completed by mons on 30 Aug 2024 06:20:32
250x250
Completed on 04 Dec 2024 08:57:38
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Liverpool
Pending by HJN030 on 08 Nov 2024 13:09:09
Completed by mons on 08 Nov 2024 14:02:21