Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
I actually don't think the Torres tackle was that bad. It was very high but he's clearly tried to pull his foot back before he makes contact with Cleverley. It's not like he tried to smash right through his chest like de Jong did with Xabi Alonso.
.verse
12 years ago
4 months ago
871
By Telegram Sam | Permalink | On 30 October 2012 - 08:55 AM
I actually don't think the Torres tackle was that bad. It was very high but he's clearly tried to pull his foot back before he makes contact with Cleverley. It's not like he tried to smash right through his chest like de Jong did with Xabi Alonso.

That was my impression of the Torres incident. It does look like he's tried to pull out of extending his leg fully and really going through Cleverley like he could have. It certainly was no worse than Evans effort on Drogba, which got nothing.

It's all done now though. The issue is that it will all pop up again with other decisions because there is simply far too much inconsistency between officials, particularly on this diving/going to ground easy thing.
Dutton
17 years ago
3 months ago
1,101
No it's a clear red, if he does that on his thigh or shin then it's a definite red so why is it not when it's ridiculously high?

He was so lucky that Cleverley just got up instead of making a meal of it.


Dermot Gallagher was on SSN yesterday and he said he had spoken to Cuntenburg (LOL) about the Torres second yellow who said that he felt that there was slight contact but he exaggerated it to gain an advantage and that's why he booked him.
.verse
12 years ago
4 months ago
871
By Dutton | Permalink | On 30 October 2012 - 09:22 AM
No it's a clear red, if he does that on his thigh or shin then it's a definite red so why is it not when it's ridiculously high?

He was so lucky that Cleverley just got up instead of making a meal of it.


Dermot Gallagher was on SSN yesterday and he said he had spoken to Cuntenburg (LOL) about the Torres second yellow who said that he felt that there was slight contact but he exaggerated it to gain an advantage and that's why he booked him.

The balls there to be won by Torres (just as in other instances when the ball is high off the ground), he has every right to try and win it. For me personally, as long as his eyes are on the ball and it's making play for that, then I don't see it as a red. The same applies for any other similar tackle. Now if the player has eyes for nothing but the man and simply follows through with the challenge with trying to pull out, then for me is a red.

If that's the case, Young should have been booked? Slight contact between him and Ivanovic and was exaggerated to gain an advantage.

As I said, there's no consistency whatsoever.
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
Cleverley is kicking the ball away and Torres comes in late. It's a straight red card. Here's the video, pay close attention to how he reacts after the challenge, it's like he knows he's going. Had Cleverley milked that challenge then I've no doubt that Torres would have been having an early shower.



EDIT: Also pay close attention to how close Torres comes to kicking Cleverley straight in the face.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Verse | Permalink | On 30 October 2012 - 09:38 AM
The balls there to be won by Torres (just as in other instances when the ball is high off the ground), he has every right to try and win it. For me personally, as long as his eyes are on the ball and it's making play for that, then I don't see it as a red. The same applies for any other similar tackle. Now if the player has eyes for nothing but the man and simply follows through with the challenge with trying to pull out, then for me is a red.

If that's the case, Young should have been booked? Slight contact between him and Ivanovic and was exaggerated to gain an advantage.

As I said, there's no consistency whatsoever.

No because that's retarded logic.

He kicked a player at chest height, it doesn't matter 'if the ball is there to be won', the balls 'there to be won' in 90% of tackles where players are sent off for lunging in or two footed tackles. It's so inconsequential to the debate that it's not worth mentioning.

I also think it's hideous bias to compare the Young one to Torres, if you've ever been running full speed and have someone clip both your feet from behind you'll know it is enough to take you down, that's what Ivanovic does. Whether it's unintentional or not, and whether Young exaggerates that by splaying his legs behind him, it's a clear DOGSO offence.

I think everyone also knows that if a player makes contact with your right leg, you don't go down as if your left leg has been touched. I've watched the Evans/Torres incident about 50 times now, and the more I watch it the more convinced I am that any contact, and there's a bit, is so minimal that the only thing that takes Torres down is Torres.

That's why there is a difference in the two cases, Young may be guilty of embellishing contact, but the contact there is enough to take a person down wheras, in Torres incident he doesn't embellish the contact, it doesn't really affect him, he can continue on towards goal unimpeded but he choses to go down. Young doesn't choose to go down, he's going down anyway, he just does so more theatrically.

I think you need to be very careful in picking your battles here, the Torres one was clearly debatable, and I imagine it would split refereeing circles straight down the middle let alone fans forums, but if you're going to argue that Ivanovic wasn't guilty of a DOGSO offence or Torres wasn't lucky to be sent off earlier on in the game then you just sound rather bitter.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
1 day ago
3,323
So glad that Howard Webb isn't playing against us come Saturday.
Boone
17 years ago
8 years ago
96
The studs are raised and at an unnecessary height as the ball was falling. It's a red card card and I can't understand how anybody would argue against that? If Torres meant to get the ball or not, it really doesnt matter, should we stop giving red cards when a goalkeeper takes out a player in a one on one, because the keeper actually meant to take the ball? Those are the rules of the game, and Torres before he developed lead feet, may have done better with that.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
How is anybody seriously thinking Torres shouldn't have had a red for that tackle? When it's that fucking high, it doesn't matter what his intentions were, he was lucky not to have walked.
Jamieandhisego
17 years ago
1 year ago
841
Why is anyone bothering to argue with Verse ffs?
Dutton
17 years ago
3 months ago
1,101
By Portaloo | Permalink | On 30 October 2012 - 10:09 AM
So glad that Howard Webb isn't playing against us come Saturday.


LOL GOOD ONE
Deano
17 years ago
2 months ago
1,380
It seems like we haven't half pissed off Steven Gerrard Some of his comments are absolutely ridiculous!

"I thought we were fantastic and stood up to a team that are very similar to Stoke," said the England skipper.

"I thought we were fantastic and stood up to a team that are very similar to Stoke. Every single time they get the ball to the goalkeeper it comes in long."

"Everton are effective because they have some big, physical lads in the team.

"We had a young, small team out there who were men and stuck together.

"There was only one team who came to play football and that was us.

"Everton are not better than us."


trolololol.

They are the team that played like Stoke and for him to say we aren't better than them? He must be fearing that we slowly are getting better than them for him to come out and say that.

His comments about Phil Neville are daft as well, he dives week in week out.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Posted this in Liverpool thread, might as well post it here:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A6aamQpCUAAy5kX.jpg

\o/


Also:

The stats for those asking relating to Gerrard's comments for long balls in the derby; Everton 14%, Liverpool 17%
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
3 days ago
5,082
Premium
Yeah, Gerrard's a tool. He just comes across as petty and immature by saying that, as well as an idiot because there's no evidence to back up his claims.
Deano
17 years ago
2 months ago
1,380
http://footballdebate.lefora.com/composition/attachment/e1aca281ce1347349bc2afed753e5b7a/42903/toffee_gerrard.jpg

Still the closest he'll ever get to touching the league trophy.
Crane
14 years ago
3 days ago
2,432
Premium
Pippadoc
15 years ago
3 years ago
386
Poe
17 years ago
5 hours ago
3,675
The one comment that sticks out is "Everton are not better than us" - what a moronic statement.

They're miles ahead of Liverpool at the minute.
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
Wouldn't say miles ahead.
Jamieandhisego
17 years ago
1 year ago
841
Considering their resources and their consistency, I'd say so.
Deano
17 years ago
2 months ago
1,380
"Subtle" comment from a Liverpool fan on the BBC article... don't ask how i guessed.

'as a mutd fan i could not agree with gerrard more, i watched the game and neverton just wanted to hit fellani every single time. liverpool played some great football and i can see them getting top4 on that evidence. + i dont know how we beat chelsea lucky we always have the refs on our side i guess'
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Whoever reported Clattenburg to the police is a cunt.

There's no way they heard anything, so they're reporting the fact that Chelsea are reporting that Clattenburg racially abused their player. The Police investigation will take fucking ages, and nothing will come of it any way if Clattenburg denies it, which he is.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
By Ninja | Permalink | On 30 October 2012 - 15:33 PM
Whoever reported Clattenburg to the police is a cunt.

There's no way they heard anything, so they're reporting the fact that Chelsea are reporting that Clattenburg racially abused their player. The Police investigation will take fucking ages, and nothing will come of it any way if Clattenburg denies it, which he is.


Was it not yer man who is talking about creating the Black PFA?
chokosc
14 years ago
1 month ago
1,041
By Ninja | Permalink | On 30 October 2012 - 15:33 PM
Whoever reported Clattenburg to the police is a cunt.

There's no way they heard anything, so they're reporting the fact that Chelsea are reporting that Clattenburg racially abused their player. The Police investigation will take fucking ages, and nothing will come of it any way if Clattenburg denies it, which he is.


Society of Black Lawyers are the ones that said the police need to investigate.... They have a point. Why would the FA, who Cluttenburg is working for, take control over the investigation?
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Slashman X | Permalink | On 30 October 2012 - 15:36 PM
Was it not yer man who is talking about creating the Black PFA?


Yeah but everyone knows Ferdinand is thick, so the fact he's had a stupid idea isn't surprising.

By chokosc | Permalink | On 30 October 2012 - 15:48 PM
Society of Black Lawyers are the ones that said the police need to investigate.... They have a point. Why would the FA, who Cluttenburg is working for, take control over the investigation?

He works for the PGMOB/L not the FA.

It's also not an issue. If you're racist at work you're investigated by your work. They're not going to treat him favourably because he's an employee, because that looks worse on them than sacking him.

If Football clubs, and football in general, had a shred of credibility they'd also conduct their own internal reviews, and discipline players accordingly.
Poe
17 years ago
5 hours ago
3,675
By Jaygull | Permalink | On 30 October 2012 - 15:21 PM
Considering their resources and their consistency, I'd say so.


I'd say if Moyes was allowed to spend the money you lot have over the past 2-3 seasons they'd be far and away the best team in Liverpool.

They already are and they've spent a fraction of it
chokosc
14 years ago
1 month ago
1,041
Point taken. Didn't think they weren't working for the FA

Still think it is something the police should also look at.

And, am I the only one that finds it really weird how referees aren't recorded? It shouldn't be too hard and it would make this thing finish a lot faster.
Dutton
17 years ago
3 months ago
1,101
Nah because players and refs probably say a lot to each other during every single game that would cause controversy if it got out.

I don't mean anything racist, just there's obviously alot they say to each other on the pitch that should be left that way. Can you imagine? FOY CALLS ROONEY AN IDIOT, GERRARD IN DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE BLIND, ACCUSES WEBB OF BEING VISUALLY IMPAIRED.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Wasn't there an experiment done where Dermot Gallagher had a mic attached to him during an Arsenal game? He was essentially a school teacher to them
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
Gerrard clearly on the wind-up, looks like it worked \o/

You'll need to Login to comment