.verse
13 years ago
1 year ago
871
Apparently taken from RAWK;

"Suarez does NOT bite, he sort of grabs hold of his opponents with his teeth, the same way a cat carries its kittens, as opposed to being mauled it (to?) death by a pitbull".

Probably Sears.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
He's a clown for biting again but those marks are nothing. Soccer players need to stop acting like babies all the time. Such drama queens. Why not just adapt the same rules as Basketball and make it illegal to touch anyone


Jesus Christ
Deano
18 years ago
6 days ago
1,380
I thought Rodgers handled Suarez well last summer myself.

Also claims of 12 month bans are ridiculous. Ill bet my right bollock not much will come out of this


I'll bet my left bollock that a lot will come out of this. He bit someone in the premier league, a global watched sport and was hammered. He's just done the same thing AGAIN, this time at the biggest sporting event on the planet pretty much watched by everyone around the world. FIFA are going to absolutely hammer him.. I'd be lost for words if they didn't. This is his third offence for doing the same thing as well. Clearly doesn't learn and a repeat offender. FIFA will want to throw the book at him, show the world that they wont stand for this sort of behaviour, in so setting an example to the children watching that it is wrong and will be punishable...
Deano
18 years ago
6 days ago
1,380
He's a clown for biting again but those marks are nothing. Soccer players need to stop acting like babies all the time. Such drama queens. Why not just adapt the same rules as Basketball and make it illegal to touch anyone


Walk to the nearest cliff, then jump off.
Crane
15 years ago
1 month ago
2,434
Premium
So long as he doesn't get banned from club football, I'll be happy.
Carroll.
15 years ago
4 years ago
3,361
Yeah that RAWK comment is totally serious..

Deano I agree with most of what you say but youre missing one point. Its FIFA. They usually do fuck all
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
According to AS Uruguay's defence is going to be that the picture on twitter was photoshopped, therefore Suarez didn't bite him.

In order to do this, they're going to use an actual photoshopped picture where the bite marks have been photoshopped out in order to argue that the bite marks in the real picture have been photoshopped.

All this in spite of the fact that there's very clear evidence that Suarez actually bit him on fucking video.

I think scousers have found a natural ally.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
Chiellini does actually have some form of mark there already though. But it's stupid focusing on the bite marks seeing as he clearly bit him

http://www.espectador.com/deportes/294036/la-marca-que-mostro-chiellini-ya-la-tenia-en-2012

Doesn't look like the mark from the pics yesterday, but there are some dents in his shoulder
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Yeah but the 'unphotoshopped' picture they're using has no marks whatsoever, which makes it even fucking weirder.

Especially as thats part of a general defence that he didn't bite him, which he obviously did.

http://media.joe.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Suarez.gif
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
Seriously can't believe he did it again.

How fucking moronic do you have to be?
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
He's got mental health problems, he has to have. Theres no other explanation.
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
You could understand just the once, like he's just snapped and at a stretch the second time. Now it's just clear he's an absolute fucking psycho who has an odd taste for human flesh!!
Based Jorge
11 years ago
4 years ago
1,399
He's got mental health problems, he has to have. Theres no other explanation.


I think he's autistic with the skill he excels in is football.
VP.
14 years ago
3 months ago
25,271
You could understand just the once, like he's just snapped and at a stretch the second time. Now it's just clear he's an absolute fucking psycho who has an odd taste for human flesh!!


In all fairness i can understand when i player kicks or punches someone, even a headbutt. But to actually bite someone even the once is just not normal and is possibly second to spitting in the worst things you could do to someone. If someone is pissing you off you'll want to hit them, but no sane person would think to themselves 'if he carries on i'm gonna bite him'. He want's fucking locking up and i think the rules are so wrong in how this sort of behavior cannot be investigated by the police just because it happened on a football pitch.
Shola
16 years ago
6 years ago
2,708
I don't get why people are outraged at the biting element. It's a bit weird, but I don't really think it's any worse than a punch.


Several player across the world will have been charged with violent conduct several times and haven't had their mental health called into question.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
Cos biting is more of an "animal" instinct than a human one like punching, kicking etc. That's why it's so odd.

Loads of psych's have come out and said that he probably chewed on something as a child when he was stressed which is why he bites "outward" when in high-pressure situations (rather than biting his own arm or something etc)
Based Jorge
11 years ago
4 years ago
1,399
Biting someone when you're frustrated isn't normal, punching & kicking is. If you're pissed off at someone you'd literally think of pissing on them before even thinking of biting them.

Basically Suarez is just a fucking retard. I'm surprised he hasn't got a 14 year old girlfriend to match his mental age.
King Luis
18 years ago
10 months ago
3,111
I don't get why people are outraged at the biting element. It's a bit weird, but I don't really think it's any worse than a punch.


Several player across the world will have been charged with violent conduct several times and haven't had their mental health called into question.


Thats what i don't really get either, glad it was you that said it cause if a Liverpool fan would have said the same thing we'd be accused of defending him which is clearly not the case.
King Luis
18 years ago
10 months ago
3,111
Biting someone when you're frustrated isn't normal, punching & kicking is. If you're pissed off at someone you'd literally think of pissing on them before even thinking of biting them.

Basically Suarez is just a fucking retard. I'm surprised he hasn't got a 14 year old girlfriend to match his mental age.


Yeah, of course you'd consider whipping your dick out and pissing on someone as a viable alternative to biting someone, thats perfectly logical
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
If you don't see why biting someone on a football pitch is a lot worse than punching someone on a football pitch (or anywhere really), then you have issues or are biased
King Luis
18 years ago
10 months ago
3,111
If you don't see why biting someone on a football pitch is a lot worse than punching someone on a football pitch (or anywhere really), then you have issues or are biased


They're both as bad as each other, just because more people are punched/elbowed/kicked on the pitch it seems normal but they're all as bad as one another.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
They're both as bad as each other, just because more people are punched/elbowed/kicked on the pitch it seems normal but they're all as bad as one another.


That is exactly why a bite is worse and is being treated as such. Players "expect" to get hit with hands and feet on football pitches and there's usually always a "jostling for the ball" excuse, not with feckin' teeth where he made the conscious decision to just monch his shoulder
Based Jorge
11 years ago
4 years ago
1,399
Yeah, of course you'd consider whipping your dick out and pissing on someone as a viable alternative to biting someone, thats perfectly logical


I take it you've never been to Maga/Malia. Braindead thickcunts do anything, even drunk northerners people do many things before even thinking to bite someone.

I love Suarez as a footballer and I think he's jokes, but as I said before there's a line you don't cross and he's sprinted across that line 3 times already. If FIFA have any sense he'll suffer from a lengthy ban.
King Luis
18 years ago
10 months ago
3,111
I take it you've never been to Maga/Malia. Braindead thickcunts do anything, even drunk northerners people do many things before even thinking to bite someone.

I love Suarez as a footballer and I think he's jokes, but as I said before there's a line you don't cross and he's sprinted across that line 3 times already. If FIFA have any sense he'll suffer from a lengthy ban.


Just because something happens in Magaluf and Malia does not make it normal, quite the opposite in fact
King Luis
18 years ago
10 months ago
3,111
That is exactly why a bite is worse and is being treated as such. Players "expect" to get hit with hands and feet on football pitches and there's usually always a "jostling for the ball" excuse, not with feckin' teeth where he made the conscious decision to just monch his shoulder


Well then all Suarez is trying to do is make it a little normal, then it'll be fine...

*Obviously a joke
Shola
16 years ago
6 years ago
2,708
If you don't see why biting someone on a football pitch is a lot worse than punching someone on a football pitch (or anywhere really), then you have issues or are biased


Do you think Suarez biting someone is worse than a Ben Thatcher elbow?

I would say the force involved is the factor I find most relevant. Rather than the body part used.
Crane
15 years ago
1 month ago
2,434
Premium
It's seen as worse by people because of the rarity that it happens and the social stigma compared to other acts of violence on the pitch, nothing to do with the severity (which is less than a punch or a proper head butt).
VP.
14 years ago
3 months ago
25,271
Carroll.
15 years ago
4 years ago
3,361
Biting someone on the pitch is worse than punching them or headbutting
Poe
18 years ago
1 week ago
3,675
Punching is manly.

Biting is for women and children.

You'll need to Login to comment