Poor source.

It's not ideal, but I wouldn't call it a poor source. I think the below source can possibly provide a good cut, considering the MP image is over 2 years old now, so I've reopened this request for cutters to perhaps give either a go:

@karakurt92, you need to make sure you find the best possible sources for your requests and not just request the first decent image you find. The ones I found are in the first 2 rows of Google Images, so it's not like they were difficult to locate. Most of your requests end up getting rejected or needing better sources to be provided, and you now need to making good requests. Thanks.

Don't you think that I also found them... but I'm sick and tired of doing that all the time and almost every time for same persons.

In case of repeat offenders, tell them that better sources are available on Google Images and reject their requests. Don't do the work for them. If you keep doing requesters' work for them, you can't blame them if they don't improve

Make them search for the alternate images and post them. And always be clear as to why their request is being rejected. "Poor source" isn't really enough, even though you've said it before to perhaps the same people. The clearer you are, the less likely it is that people will say they did not understand. It doesn't have to be a whole paragraph; a "Rejected because (a) (b) and (c). This person's cut is recent and decent/Find a better source before requesting this guy again" is more than enough and provides worthwhile feedback to anybody bar the most obstinate.

I will develop myself in this matter. Thank you. )

missing or not good enough? @mons 

By julkjulk 10 June 2021 - 18:34 PM UTC 

missing or not good enough? @mons 

 

Just missing, I'm afraid. Into the next update pack it goes 👍