Dale Taylor - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
2000008139
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
This isn't really large enough to provide an improvement to the current, recent, good-quality megapack cut.
The source image from the current cut is just big enough for a 180x180, so I think an image enlarger has been used to make it 250? So in these cases it's not really a fair comparison I think
The source image from the current cut is just big enough for a 180x180, so I think an image enlarger has been used to make it 250? So in these cases it's not really a fair comparison I think
I see what you mean, but at the end of the day it's not really worth cutting imo. It's virtually identical anyway. If the image to be produced is not visibly recent or of superior quality, there's hardly any point 🙂
I see what you mean, but at the end of the day it's not really worth cutting imo. It's virtually identical anyway. If the image to be produced is not visibly recent or of superior quality, there's hardly any point 🙂
Yeah for this one I agree, but in general just seems a bit unfair to me to use an image enlarger
Yeah for this one I agree, but in general just seems a bit unfair to me to use an image enlarger
I'm not a big fan of image enlargers either, but as long as the cut is of a good enough quality, then it's no big deal.
This isn't really large enough to provide an improvement to the current, recent, good-quality megapack cut.