Anthony Gonçalves - Submissions - Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

85007087

Timeline

960x1440
This image is part of a pack: Stade Malherbe Caen
Pending by Side Splitting Pass on 31 Jan 2021 17:03:53
Completed by mons on 21 Feb 2021 11:04:38
Pending by Side Splitting Pass on 21 Feb 2021 11:05:43
Completed by mons on 21 Feb 2021 11:25:17
1305x690
250x250
This image is a response to #1198745
Completed by mons on 21 Feb 2021 11:04:38
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Request mixpack
Completed by mons on 21 Feb 2021 11:25:17
mons
17 years ago
5 hours ago
86,609

@77david54, it's not a bad cut, but I don't understand why you went to the trouble of finding a smaller, lower quality source of him not looking at the camera when such an excellent source was available.

 

Screenshot of still videos will never be as good as a high-quality photoshoot image, irrespective of the video quality.

77david54
3 years ago
2 years ago
1,416
By mons 21 February 2021 - 11:28 AM UTC 

@77david54, it's not a bad cut, but I don't understand why you went to the trouble of finding a smaller, lower quality source of him not looking at the camera when such an excellent source was available.

 

Screenshot of still videos will never be as good as a high-quality photoshoot image, irrespective of the video quality.

Sorry but i do not agree at all. Already i find the other horrible source for this player. The image is missing pixels and the player does not look like that at all in real life. My source is from february 5 , 2021 , the other source must be from august 2020. It's a shame that the player lowers his head a bit on my source.

For me , other than that , my source is clearly superior to the other source. It is a pity that the cuts out faces are not in 500 X 500 pixels , there the difference is obvious. You tried to zoom in on both?

The other source is already in 300dpi. My source is therefore greater if i pass it in 300dpi. Afterwards , you put on the cut out face in megapack you want.

Not all players will always choose the one in the megapack.

 

weeniehutjr
6 years ago
2 days ago
5,204
By 77david54 22 February 2021 - 00:36 AM UTC 

Sorry but i do not agree at all. Already i find the other horrible source for this player. The image is missing pixels and the player does not look like that at all in real life. My source is from february 5 , 2021 , the other source must be from august 2020. It's a shame that the player lowers his head a bit on my source.

For me , other than that , my source is clearly superior to the other source. It is a pity that the cuts out faces are not in 500 X 500 pixels , there the difference is obvious. You tried to zoom in on both?

The other source is already in 300dpi. My source is therefore greater if i pass it in 300dpi. Afterwards , you put on the cut out face in megapack you want.

Not all players will always choose the one in the megapack.

 

I don't understand what you mean by ‘missing pixels', can you be more specific? Regardless, wherever possible, the subject of the cutout should be looking directly at the camera. Because his head is tilted downwards and he's looking away from the camera, it isn't useful as a source image.

I also disagree - your source is not “clearly” superior by any means. The fidelity of the image is poor; because it is a screencap from a video and not a photograph from a professional photoshoot the source has been compressed too much, and the cutout is blurry. I've viewed both cutouts resized to 500px and the only “obvious difference” I can see is that the blurry edges of the hair in your cutout become more apparent… 😕

The image being at 300dpi (dots per inch) is also completely irrelevant - dpi is used for sizing images for printing, and isn't used for computer screens. Instead, images on computer screens are determined by pixel dimensions. Web images are at 72 by “default” and there's no need to change it from that unless you're printing out the cutout images.

250x250
This image is part of a pack: Stade Lavallois Mayenne FC- 2022/2023
Pending by rekooner2 on 17 Oct 2022 13:09:05
Completed by mons on 17 Oct 2022 13:42:31
250x250
Completed on 11 Oct 2023 22:32:36
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Stade lavallois Mayenne Football Club 2023/24
Pending by rekooner2 on 25 Sep 2023 22:37:56
Completed by mons on 26 Sep 2023 06:32:52
250x250
Completed on 22 Feb 2024 21:13:56
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Laval - Ligue 2
Pending by Vinceultras42 on 10 Feb 2024 15:08:19
Completed by mons on 10 Feb 2024 17:05:23