Armamaddon Activity
this can be a “problem” even with actual kits, so the best solution is: once there is a pack: there can be a file attached, otherwise you only can do it by hand pregame or ingame editor (ingame editor will be the only solution also if you already sta...
@tv_capper this is the real kit, the away kit is similar in grey
@bolid74 are you OK with these uploads?
@jose julio away: Denke instead of Oisix as sponsor on the upper front
@jose julio away is more of a grey → https://www.footballkitarchive.com/sk-slovan-bratislava-2025-26-away-kit-392134/third has yellow stars on the back
@jose julio away has a different pattern
@mariodeleon1011 this is not even right in style, but also there is no option for the FM26 map to work in 23/24
@jose julio
@_thetracker missing sponsors, wrong placement of logos, wrong collar, wrong sleeves, no backside
@_thetracker wrong sleeves, wrong front style, wrong size of sponsor, no backside, no sponsor on shorts
I guessed you took that photo, but somehow it is wrong, maybe it is AI or for reaching the finals, I don't know, but the “wings” reach over the top, so it should be visible even from that ankle
@Ronaldo Fenômeno the cup has “wings”
To be honest, I couldn't care less about this. 😀 There is only one player with that armband and in reality they also place it just “somewhere” and don't care about the visibility of any sponsor.
I made it to the Official Thread 🙂
It is not like we don't allow requests or you should be “patient” till you are old. But 3 requests in five days leads to nothing. Also there is a bit of context you now add. If you had said something like “I want to know this because otherwise I will crea...
If nobody responded to your first post 5 days ago or your next post yesterday, so does nobody now (my guess) … So what comes in your mind? - after being informed about the case by now two staff-members - maybe try it another 10 times in the next two days...
@Heisskaalt FC Eintracht Rheine (Germany) - ID 879301 - 25/26
@Heisskaalt FC Eintracht Rheine (Germany) - ID 879301 - 25/26
@jose julio slightly different style on home kit (pattern + collar)+ schau essen sponsor on the back of both slightly different+ arm sponsors a bit more visible/bigger … just slightly → https://www.footballkitarchive.com/cerezo-osaka-2026-home-k...
@Alejandro Benavides missing sponsors + wrong colors (the pink one is goalkeeper)
but it doesn't work for FM26, this is the FM24 map
FC Balzers (Liechtenstein) - ID 1206 - 25/26
FC Balzers (Liechtenstein) - ID 1206 - 25/26
with “old version” I meanI got an other created shirt for an other safe loaded like a year ago and that one still shows up in game but the new shirts won't. is it for Bari aswell? try to do two folders, one for 2d, one for 3d 2d config:&nbs...
normally I do configs like this: <record><boolean id="preload" value="false"/><boolean id="amap" value="false"/><list id="maps"> <record from="" to="graphics/pictures/team/ID/kit_textures/VERSION" /> </list&...
@jose julio it is a rectangle and more to the middle of the sleeves (but not down to the seam)
@Faisalx3 different sponsors on the back + missing sponsor on the right sleeve on all kits
@Faisalx3 missing sponsor: Sanabil investments (right sleeve)incomplete sponsor: Riyad Bank (letters) upper back more saturated blue on home and third
@jose julio away: shoulders are a bit different (wider & more down to the sleeve) + Bauhaus sponsor is the same like home
@Markito22 wrong logo, wrong styles, wrong styled sponsors, wrong sleeves
@jose julio home: shoulders different, upper back with flag and line, socks three linesaway: "Region de Murica" below manufacturer on front is not here (if you have other sources please ignore this), seems to be white shorts + pink socks with two lin...
Yeah, of course. That's why I said “(not all)”. But in the end we have a lot of stuff where creators don't know how to fix problems. Not even how the real map is build up. This is a bit sad. The converters should work properly. Otherwise this is useless....
as far as I know this is true, I don't own the game
@Davi Veras https://sortitoutsi.net/content/184/3d10-13-official-kits-thread?page=630#comment_772232
I agree with you about the whole technical thing. I do kits myself and if I see most of the converted (not all) or kitmaker-results, it makes me really sad. But as staff member I can't agree to call it shit, even if I would partly agree to it 😀Soulless i...
It is a bit too harsh comment, but in the end it is not that false. It is a place to learn here, yeah, but all you did is to put two converters in line. So if you want to learn, start to create instead of convert. We have a lot of creators here who will h...
You sent something to me? No? You meant marco talhadas? Anyway, please check the sources of the kits without marco talhadas watermark. I am not the strictest about re-using my content, but at least ask for it. The kits in the acutal state are no...
there is a lack of quality in these kits (e.g. Al Nassr kits) and a lot of configs
some are clearly made by me (2021 versions)+ the map is wrong + maybe it is debatable if there is a need of 2022 kits for 2026
it depends, if the creator loads it into the system they are part, but some don'tso we have 3 sources:1 the thread2 the submission-system3 individual packs
@Victor Bhering Bahia II long sleeve left side sponsor is mirrored
no it does not, see in which part the umbro-logo is, where the black line ends on the collar+ the umbro letters are not the right ones on the back … please be more accurate on this one finally+ no league badge
@Dralex05 home: slightly different style on the back + missing sponsor + different style for socks can't find evidence for away + third is just a variation of home + shorts are wrong
@Ibarra wrong styles, low quality, missing details on collar and sleeves, wrong sizing, wrong placement of sponsors
@Ibarra missing styles on back, shorts, wrong sizing, lack of quality on sponsor
@Ibarra inaccuracies in styles, collars and details
@Philipp Rasche missing line on collar + slightly improvement on sleeves necessary
there should be a config, but not a .fmf