Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

Our Cut-Out Faces Megapack is the biggest collection of Football Manager Player Faces available. All players are available in the default cut-out style. When you download our Cut-Out Faces Megapack, you'll receive over 450,000 player faces to spice up your copy of Football Manager.

  • 463,302
  • 2024.07 - Released on 15 Apr 2024
Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
ID 1394631578 and 1394631578 are the same pics but diferent person in DB.

They're the same UID
Makitos
16 years ago
1 week ago
958
They're the same UID


My mistake, the ID are 1394631578 & 1394631579 with the same picture.
aless
16 years ago
3 years ago
47
Ardit Gashi 43270790 - Missing in megapack

http://i68.tinypic.com/ifoqae.png
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
Ardit Gashi 43270790 - Missing in megapack

http://i68.tinypic.com/ifoqae.png

Hi there old friend, nice to see you again

We now have a dedicated request forum here: https://sortitoutsi.net/graphics/style/1/cut-out-player-faces/requests
aless
16 years ago
3 years ago
47
Hi mons sorry about that. I was looking for the dedicated thread but cant find it. Thank for pointed it out. Good seeing you still around the community.
ducc
11 years ago
1 day ago
1,397
Hi mons.

I think the Cut Out pack contains more than 40000 images with IDs that are not (anymore) in FM DB. Naturally having them in provides backwards compatibility and coverage (also I don't know if SI are in habit of bringing back removed players/staff with old IDs), but its still about 2GB worth "redundant" files. Have you ever considered removing at least some of the oldest images with non-existing IDs?
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
Hi mons.

I think the Cut Out pack contains more than 40000 images with IDs that are not (anymore) in FM DB. Naturally having them in provides backwards compatibility and coverage (also I don't know if SI are in habit of bringing back removed players/staff with old IDs), but its still about 2GB worth "redundant" files. Have you ever considered removing at least some of the oldest images with non-existing IDs?

I don't know of any method which can help identify which cuts are no longer in the FM database...
ovidiu10
17 years ago
4 days ago
13,132
Premium
As HR for Romania I can tell you that every year I delete some players/staff from database: some of them died, retired from football, quit playing etc.

But most of them are set as not for extraction (they are still in database, but somehow inactive), and maybe next years I will mark them back as active and they will appear in the game with the same ID.

It works same for the whole database. So now there are players that are not in FM17, but could be back in FM18 or 19 with same ID.
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
As HR for Romania I can tell you that every year I delete some players/staff from database: some of them died, retired from football, quit playing etc.

But most of them are set as not for extraction (they are still in database, but somehow inactive), and maybe next years I will mark them back as active and they will appear in the game with the same ID.

It works same for the whole database. So now there are players that are not in FM17, but could be back in FM18 or 19 with same ID.

I'm the Maltese researcher, so I know how it works in terms of the database, but I don't know of a way in which it would be possible to identify the UIDs in the megapack which are not in a particular game's database version.
ducc
11 years ago
1 day ago
1,397
As HR for Romania I can tell you that every year I delete some players/staff from database: some of them died, retired from football, quit playing etc.

But most of them are set as not for extraction (they are still in database, but somehow inactive), and maybe next years I will mark them back as active and they will appear in the game with the same ID.

It works same for the whole database. So now there are players that are not in FM17, but could be back in FM18 or 19 with same ID.

I suppose while the IDs are inactive, they are stored in some sort of master DB and are not present in the game DB that is provided with each copy of FM? Naturally there is a Person Type Retired, but that is possibly a different thing.


I'm the Maltese researcher, so I know how it works in terms of the database, but I don't know of a way in which it would be possible to identify the UIDs in the megapack which are not in a particular game's database version.

A programmer could probably code a nice little application that compares IDs present in the DB to IDs present in the pack, but I have tried to come up with a way to do the same thing by other means (to spot "redundant" logos in the DVX logopack). Perhaps there is a simpler way, but here is what I have been thinking about:
  • The IDs of the people in the DB are known, while the IDs of the people not in the DB are not known.
  • All the images with a name (ID) that is in the DB, can be renamed with an added indicator. So, if we have an image with an existing ID of 12345, it can be renamed to, say, 12345_infmdb173. The images with name that is not in the DB are not renamed.
  • Every image that has ”_infmdb173” in its name is of a person that is in the DB, and conversely every image that does not have have it in its name is of a person that is not in the DB. The "redundant" images have been identified.
To do the above, one needs FM, FM Genie Scout, Bulk Rename Utility and Notepad++ (or another text editor with similar functions). Genie Scout is needed to export Unique IDs to text file, Bulk Rename Utility is needed to rename files en masse, and Notepad++ is needed to massage the Unique ID text file to a format Bulk Rename Utility can use. I can describe the whole procedure in more detail if it is required.

In any case the method does work, but of course there is a question whether Genie Scout actually exports all the IDs (after creating a save with maximum number of players included). Is there a way to export IDs directly from the DB?

mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
I suppose while the IDs are inactive, they are stored in some sort of master DB and are not present in the game DB that is provided with each copy of FM? Naturally there is a Person Type Retired, but that is possibly a different thing.

A programmer could probably code a nice little application that compares IDs present in the DB to IDs present in the pack, but I have tried to come up with a way to do the same thing by other means (to spot "redundant" logos in the DVX logopack). Perhaps there is a simpler way, but here is what I have been thinking about:
  • The IDs of the people in the DB are known, while the IDs of the people not in the DB are not known.
  • All the images with a name (ID) that is in the DB, can be renamed with an added indicator. So, if we have an image with an existing ID of 12345, it can be renamed to, say, 12345_infmdb173. The images with name that is not in the DB are not renamed.
  • Every image that has ”_infmdb173” in its name is of a person that is in the DB, and conversely every image that does not have have it in its name is of a person that is not in the DB. The "redundant" images have been identified.
To do the above, one needs FM, FM Genie Scout, Bulk Rename Utility and Notepad++ (or another text editor with similar functions). Genie Scout is needed to export Unique IDs to text file, Bulk Rename Utility is needed to rename files en masse, and Notepad++ is needed to massage the Unique ID text file to a format Bulk Rename Utility can use. I can describe the whole procedure in more detail if it is required.

In any case the method does work, but of course there is a question whether Genie Scout actually exports all the IDs (after creating a save with maximum number of players included). Is there a way to export IDs directly from the DB?

At the end of the day, though, is it really worth going to all that trouble just to remove images which may need to be added again at a later date? Quite apart from the fact that loads of people already have the base megapack images, how would it be possible to remove images from somebody else's computer?
ducc
11 years ago
1 day ago
1,397
At the end of the day, though, is it really worth going to all that trouble just to remove images which may need to be added again at a later date?

I tested the identification method on the Cut Out Megapack, and it indicated a rather large number of possibly superfluous files. Whether its worth to worry or do anything about is another thing, but I thought it would not hurt to mention it...

Once FM18 is out, I will certainly look to see if the DVX logopack contains logos that have IDs not present in the new DB. If for no other reason than to see what they are (but quite probably to also remove at least some of them).


Quite apart from the fact that loads of people already have the base megapack images, how would it be possible to remove images from somebody else's computer?

Naturally the pack would have to be re-released after removing images.
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
I tested the identification method on the Cut Out Megapack, and it indicated a rather large number of possibly superfluous files. Whether its worth to worry or do anything about is another thing, but I thought it would not hurt to mention it...

Once FM18 is out, I will certainly look to see if the DVX logopack contains logos that have IDs not present in the new DB. If for no other reason than to see what they are (but quite probably to also remove at least some of them).

There's less churn in terms of logos when compared to players, as proportionally fewer clubs get disbanded than players retire each year.


Naturally the pack would have to be re-released after removing images.

I'm a bit wary of having separate megapack versions, particularly in terms of technical support matters. Also, you'd be surprised how many people play older FM versions, and removing "archived" person's cuts would have a large impact.
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
My mistake, the ID are 1394631578 & 1394631579 with the same picture.

And neither is correct. I'll remove both
ducc
11 years ago
1 day ago
1,397
I'm not necessarily advocating for any action or inaction. I merely pointed out the relatively large number of images with IDs that do not have a counterpart in the current data, and asked if you had ever considered removing such images.


There's less churn in terms of logos when compared to players, as proportionally fewer clubs get disbanded than players retire each year.

There are far fewer clubs than people to begin with, but I'm not sure ”churn” is what logos have less of. From this thread it seems that people's IDs might be deactivated, and then reactivated at a later date – rather straightforward. A plausible scenario with logos is that a club goes bankrupt, and is set as extinct in the DB. Then essentially the same club will make a comeback with a slightly different name under a different ID. After a season or two the new club will IRL be considered the same as the old club, and the ID that was marked as extinct is resurrected. At this point the new ID is marked extinct or entirely removed (or deactivated?). It is my estimation that these new IDs that have disappeared are less likely to be brought back.


I'm a bit wary of having separate megapack versions, particularly in terms of technical support matters. Also, you'd be surprised how many people play older FM versions, and removing "archived" person's cuts would have a large impact.

Removing images would still require a new separate version of the pack, since deleting images from other people's computers is not be feasible.
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
9.07 is now available for download. It contains 2,214 new or improved images and takes the total MP head count to over 184,000.

As usual, this would have been impossible without the contributors of the requesters and especially our cutters. I'd also like to thank @BajaHater who double-checks the images after me. Any mistakes, omissions or oversights are my fault and not his
Baja
14 years ago
2 weeks ago
35,837
9.07 is now available for download. It contains 2,214 new or improved images and takes the total MP head count to over 184,000.

As usual, this would have been impossible without the contributors of the requesters and especially our cutters. I'd also like to thank @BajaHater who double-checks the images after me. Any mistakes, omissions or oversights are my fault and not his

You are a legend mate,many tnx to all people who helped with requests and cuts as always!
Grimnir
16 years ago
3 months ago
2,727
Congrats and thanks to all!
goodsoul
16 years ago
1 hour ago
0
Premium
Great stuff! Thanks for all your hand work!
diogoamaral
13 years ago
18 hours ago
12,280
Nuno Pereira 55081296 image is wrong, it belongs to Petit 4102269
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
Nuno Pereira 55081296 image is wrong, it belongs to Petit 4102269

Do you have a Nuno Pereira source perchance?
diogoamaral
13 years ago
18 hours ago
12,280
Do you have a Nuno Pereira source perchance?


Not a decent one:
https://scontent.flis3-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/75951_102821353192519_1759982437_n.jpg?oh=01e9213ac0ff64f2715f5937872fb78c&oe=5939D95E
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
@diogoamaral , I'll just remove it from the MP then...
hjs
16 years ago
2 years ago
1,643
Premium
noticed some mistake in megapck

Philippe Emond (UID18005333) has a wrong picture:

this is the right person

https://s1-ssl.dmcdn.net/fQG_Y.jpg

https://entreprendre.belfius.be/img/cases/emond_fw.jpg
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998
noticed some mistake in megapck

Philippe Emond (UID18005333) has a wrong picture:

this is the right person

https://s1-ssl.dmcdn.net/fQG_Y.jpg

https://entreprendre.belfius.be/img/cases/emond_fw.jpg

Can you make a request for it and add a comment that it's a mistaken identity?
hjs
16 years ago
2 years ago
1,643
Premium
Can you make a request for it and add a comment that it's a mistaken identity?


done
bigpole
12 years ago
1 day ago
9,336
mons
17 years ago
1 hour ago
85,998

Thanks for this; good spot. I'll look to change it for the next update pack
Mool3eNz
8 years ago
3 years ago
1
blackpower
13 years ago
3 hours ago
6
Ok no dev, more steps for user is good i think.

You'll need to Login to comment