@Jason26, not a bad cut but I suspect the original source was on the small side because the eventual cut isn't the sharpest. With the current cut being essentially identical and not too old, it means this cut isn't really an improvement, as outlined in the guidelines.
@Jason26, not a bad cut but I suspect the original source was on the small side because the eventual cut isn't the sharpest. With the current cut being essentially identical and not too old, it means this cut isn't really an improvement, as outlined in the guidelines.