@Ünal Burak, just cropping and upscaling your original cut will mean the image isn't as sharp as it would be if you recut the larger version of the source uploaded earlier today.
@Ünal Burak, just cropping and upscaling your original cut will mean the image isn't as sharp as it would be if you recut the larger version of the source uploaded earlier today.
Cevabınıza saygı duymakla birlikte, kendi oyunuma uygulamamda netlik açısından bir sorun yok.If the subject is a problem of clarity; In addition, the last image I uploaded seems to be in better condition than the previously created and approved works.
Cevabınıza saygı duymakla birlikte, kendi oyunuma uygulamamda netlik açısından bir sorun yok.If the subject is a problem of clarity; In addition, the last image I uploaded seems to be in better condition than the previously created and approved works.
This is already the second time you've referred to other cutters' work. Firstly, I would suggest that you focus on your own cuts. Secondly, as I've already suggested elsewhere, if you have images you think have been added to the megapack when they shouldn't be, please point them out so we can fix or remove them. Otherwise, it's just an exercise in complaining for the sake of complaining.
Thirdly, I hope you can see the difference in the cut you've produced from the smaller source, and the one I produced from the larger source. The bigger the source image, the better the eventual cut, which is why I rejected your cut, because the larger source would provide a better cut than anything possible from the smaller source.
This is already the second time you've referred to other cutters' work. Firstly, I would suggest that you focus on your own cuts. Secondly, as I've already suggested elsewhere, if you have images you think have been added to the megapack when they shouldn't be, please point them out so we can fix or remove them. Otherwise, it's just an exercise in complaining for the sake of complaining.
Thirdly, I hope you can see the difference in the cut you've produced from the smaller source, and the one I produced from the larger source. The bigger the source image, the better the eventual cut, which is why I rejected your cut, because the larger source would provide a better cut than anything possible from the smaller source.
This is not something that was said to refer to or vilify, but you perceive it as such, unfortunately. I don't want to explain more and waste your time, after all, you will justify yourself somehow. yes, I agree, the most beautiful and clearest content belongs to you(!). good work...
This is not something that was said to refer to or vilify, but you perceive it as such, unfortunately. I don't want to explain more and waste your time, after all, you will justify yourself somehow. yes, I agree, the most beautiful and clearest content belongs to you(!). good work...
That's not what I'm saying, and I suspect you know it. I'm simply saying that a source as good as the one requested should provide a better cut than what you did. I merely provided my cut as a practical demonstration of what I meant. I can assure you that any regular cutter could provide a cut like mine, or maybe even better.
And frankly, if whenever we give you feedback on your cuts, you always criticise others', it's only fair to ask you to share your viewpoint with us in order to ensure we maintain the high quality of the megapack that we aim for.
I make no apologies for justifying myself and the work of my colleagues, especially when there's an opportunity to help a new member to understand our guidelines and our approaches.
Background and Stadium Packs
wieczus2000