Marco Hiller - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack

91175665

Timeline

250x250
This image is part of a pack: TSV 1860 Munchen 2020-2021 Update
Pending by Asket on 11 May 2021 08:12:44
Completed by weeniehutjr on 11 May 2021 10:08:49
2048x1434
This image is part of a pack: TSV 1860 München 21-22
Pending by BeyazRuh59 on 28 Sep 2021 03:38:00
In Progress by Ronaldo Fenômeno on 28 Sep 2021 14:01:13
Completed by mons on 28 Sep 2021 14:12:56
250x250
This image is part of a pack: TSV 1860 München 21-22
Pending by Ronaldo Fenômeno on 28 Sep 2021 14:06:20
Completed by mons on 28 Sep 2021 14:12:56
250x250
This image is part of a pack: RT7 Mixpack 49
Pending by RT7 on 23 Jul 2022 11:48:31
Completed by mons on 23 Jul 2022 12:00:17
250x250
Completed on 22 Feb 2024 21:14:11
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Mixpack
Pending by carlos6 on 10 Feb 2024 00:40:28
Completed by mons on 10 Feb 2024 10:47:50
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Replacing Cuts that Should Not Have Been Submitted In the First Place
Pending by John Doe 1789 on 16 Nov 2024 23:57:12
Completed by mons on 17 Nov 2024 08:01:15
John Doe 1789
2 months ago
1 day ago
31
Banned

@mons My honorable moderator, as I have already brought up the same topic in the forum,

I would like to inform you about the damage accumulated by may-be or perhaps intentional vandals.

 

I've checked the submission history of inept cutters, and they all display the uniformed behavioral pattern:

  • They have a history of getting your written warning repeatedly on the same topic
  • Those faulty cuts are mostly submitted in the pack form and get accepted

 

Accepting defective work steadily lowers the overall quality of our long-cherished collective work;

It is also an insult to the previous contributors who had put time and efforts to find a quality source and crating it to an enjoyable work, including myself who contributed hundreds of cuts throughout the last decade.

 

You should give those unruly cutters red-flagged warning instead of written comments, and reject the subpar submission.

They are exploiting your leniency, and most importantly, doing a disservice to the millions of FM players; and millions more players to come and play in the future.

 

mons
18 years ago
10 hours ago
90,991
By John Doe 1789 17 November 2024 - 01:38 AM UTC 

@mons My honorable moderator, as I have already brought up the same topic in the forum,

I would like to inform you about the damage accumulated by may-be or perhaps intentional vandals.

 

I've checked the submission history of inept cutters, and they all display the uniformed behavioral pattern:

  • They have a history of getting your written warning repeatedly on the same topic
  • Those faulty cuts are mostly submitted in the pack form and get accepted

 

Accepting defective work steadily lowers the overall quality of our long-cherished collective work;

It is also an insult to the previous contributors who had put time and efforts to find a quality source and crating it to an enjoyable work, including myself who contributed hundreds of cuts throughout the last decade.

 

You should give those unruly cutters red-flagged warning instead of written comments, and reject the subpar submission.

They are exploiting your leniency, and most importantly, doing a disservice to the millions of FM players; and millions more players to come and play in the future.

 

The only one getting a banning is you. People are doing this for free and I don't think that warrants being talked to in this rude and disrespectful manner. I have no time for your input and mischief-making.