tmatthew
17 years ago
5 months ago
771
Except noone is saying Januzaj would play tomorrow, but in 3/5 years or whatever if he decided to become a citizen.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Home Nations Agreement wouldn't allow it anyway.

Pointless issue this. Chap plays 1 decent game and the English media are raving on about him playing for England.

Also kind of hypocritical of the FA to be giving out to Prem clubs for not giving English youngsters a chance, then going ahead and asking about some random foreigners eligibility.
tmatthew
17 years ago
5 months ago
771
Home Nations Agreement wouldn't allow it anyway.

Pointless issue this. Chap plays 1 decent game and the English media are raving on about him playing for England.

Also kind of hypocritical of the FA to be giving out to Prem clubs for not giving English youngsters a chance, then going ahead and asking about some random foreigners eligibility.


Probably wondering what the fuck he's done to cause so much fuss.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
Define 'English'.

It's ignorant at the least, xenophobic at its worst. Januzaj won't play for England anyway, so that's irrelevant.

I assume he was gutted during the olympics when the Somalian Mo Farah won all of those golds as well.

He's a cretin.

In fact lets go further, how about the Ivory Coast born Wilfred Zaha? Jamaican born Raheem Sterling? Belgium born Bradley Wiggins? Chris Froome?

You're taking it completely out of context which is no surprise considering your dislike of him.

What Jack Wilshere said today has been said by numerous journalists and pundits over the past few days and in recent times - that English players should play for the national side. There's obviously a clear fucking difference between Wilfried Zaha, who moved to England when he was four years old and has spent the majority of his life in England, and Adnan Januzaj, a Belgian-born kid of Albanian and Kosovan heritage who has lived in England for two years. Janujaz, clearly, can in no way be interpreted as English, whereas the likes of Zaha and Sterling, who have lived in this country for the majority of their lives, clearly can.

You're just deciding to be outraged because it's Wilshere. What he is saying has been said by so many people before. There have been debates before about Mikel Arteta and Manuel Almunia potentially playing for England - are the people who said they shouldn't be chosen, because they're clearly fucking Spanish, xenophobic as well? Obviously not.

Pathetic.
BR.
17 years ago
2 years ago
1,896
If I see one more 'Who is Adnan Januzaj?' at the side of an article........
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
Define 'English'.

It's ignorant at the least, xenophobic at its worst. Januzaj won't play for England anyway, so that's irrelevant.

I assume he was gutted during the olympics when the Somalian Mo Farah won all of those golds as well.

He's a cretin.

In fact lets go further, how about the Ivory Coast born Wilfred Zaha? Jamaican born Raheem Sterling? Belgium born Bradley Wiggins? Chris Froome?


Let's go even further;

Jack Wilshere - "I''m a white supremacist, who believes in a racially pure England national team. Ain't no black in the Union Jack."

Bored of the whole outraged xenophobic thing. Oliver Kay was suggesting that people don't want Januzaj to play for England because he has a a foreign name ffs.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
In the real world, outside of football, there's no circumstances in which Adnan Januzaj can be considered English. Was he born in England? No. Does he have any English heritage, as far we know? No. Has he lived in this country from a young age? No, he hasn't.

Wilfried Zaha and Raheem Stirling have grown up as Englishmen in this country and can quite comfortably be considered as English in non-footballing terms. Januzaj cannot and is only being considered because of some supposed eligibility laws that could have allowed someone like Manuel Almunia to represent England.

As I've already said, what Jack Wilshere has come out with today is no different from what plenty of other people involved in football have said across the years in regards to this debate. It's just cool to hate on Jack Wilshere at the moment and that's why Ninja has come out and accused him of being a xenophobe, which is fucking nonsense.
tmatthew
17 years ago
5 months ago
771
In the real world, outside of football, there's no circumstances in which Adnan Januzaj can be considered English. Was he born in England? No. Does he have any English heritage, as far we know? No. Has he lived in this country from a young age? No, he hasn't.

Daniel Sturridge and Raheem Stirling have grown up as Englishmen in this country and can quite comfortably be considered as English in non-footballing terms. Januzaj cannot and is only being considered because of some supposed eligibility laws that could have allowed someone like Manuel Almunia to represent England.

As I've already said, what Jack Wilshere has come out with today is no different from what plenty of other people involved in football have said across the years in regards to this debate. It's just cool to hate on Jack Wilshere at the moment and that's why Ninja has come out and accused him of being a xenophobe, which is fucking nonsense.


Out of interest, what age would he have had to move to the UK to be considered English? 5? 10? 14?
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
Out of interest, what age would he have had to move to the UK to be considered English? 5? 10? 14?

I don't know - it's a messy argument - but my point is there's a clear difference between Wilfried Zaha, who's lived here since he was four and grew up in British schools, than Januzaj, who's lived in this country since he was sixteen. There's just no way, in the real world, Januzaj can be considered an Englishman. Am I wrong in saying that?

In terms of eligibility for national sides, I don't know exactly how it works but it would seem logical to have a rule where a player, for example, needs to have resided in the country for five years or so before their 18th birthday.

What angers me about the outrage is that some people have taken the comments completely out of context and are implying that Wilshere is some sort of BNP-supporting, nationalist xenophone, which is bullshit. All he's said is that a player who can no way be interpreted as English, and would only be available for England due to some weird eligibility ruling, shouldn't be able to play for England. I know he wasn't talking about Januzaj directly but that was the point.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
Januzaj moved here to be a professional footballer.

Zaha/Sterling/Welbeck/Berahino/Moses/Ameobi etc. didn't.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
Januzaj moved here to be a professional footballer.

Zaha/Sterling/Welbeck/Berahino/Moses/Ameobi etc. didn't.

Exactly, and all of the players mentioned can be seen as Englishmen outside of football. Januzaj cannot.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
16 hours ago
3,323
I'm going to disagree with Wilshere only because I want to see Arteta play international football.

http://www.culpwrit.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/2cents.jpg
tmatthew
17 years ago
5 months ago
771
I don't know - it's a messy argument - but my point is there's a clear difference between Wilfried Zaha, who's lived here since he was four and grew up in British schools, than Januzaj, who's lived in this country since he was sixteen. There's just no way, in the real world, Januzaj can be considered an Englishman. Am I wrong in saying that?


There is an obvious difference, but if there's no cut-off age for eligibility then it just depends on your own opinion. Technically, outside the world of football if Januzaj (or anyone) decides he wants to become a UK citizen and has lived here for five years, then he can do, and he'll be as British as you and I (legally speaking).

With regards to your suggestion of having to live here for five years before the age of 18, I could just as easily argue that it should be five years before the age of 21 and he would qualify. I would draw the line there though as I wouldn't have wanted the likes of Almunia or Arteta to be eligible.

(For the record I'm not advocating Januzaj playing for England, but it's an interesting argument).
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
There is an obvious difference, but if there's no cut-off age for eligibility then it just depends on your own opinion. Technically, outside the world of football if Januzaj (or anyone) decides he wants to become a UK citizen and has lived here for five years, then he can do, and he'll be as British as you and I (legally speaking).

With regards to your suggestion of having to live here for five years before the age of 18, I could just as easily argue that it should be five years before the age of 21 and he would qualify. I would draw the line there though as I wouldn't have wanted the likes of Almunia or Arteta to be eligible.

(For the record I'm not advocating Januzaj playing for England, but it's an interesting argument).

Yeah, it's certainly a murky debate. My main point is that Wilshere was clearly saying he didn't want non-English players playing for England - guys like Almunia and Arteta, for example - whereas some people have twisted it into meaning he doesn't want refugees from war-torn countries who moved here when they were kids playing for England. As I've said before, he's only repeating what plenty of people have said in the past but he's being chastised by a significant number of people.
VP.
13 years ago
1 month ago
25,271
The likes of Almunia, Arteta etc would only want to play for England because they're too shite to play for their home nation (or their home nation will never make a major tournament in other players cases). Where as someone who is brought up in the country from a young age should (you would think) actually take some pride in representing the nation and see it as an honour to wear the shirt.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
There is an obvious difference, but if there's no cut-off age for eligibility then it just depends on your own opinion.


If you're talking about football terms then there is a cut-off
tmatthew
17 years ago
5 months ago
771
So what is it?
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
I've been reading this story on Twitter and Reddit and by God, some people don't half love to be outraged. Stirling and Zaha keep being mentioned despite the fact Wilshere never said you had to be born in this country to be English. Pietersen's a fucking idiot as well. Comments taken completely out of context.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
You're taking it completely out of context which is no surprise considering your dislike of him.

What Jack Wilshere said today has been said by numerous journalists and pundits over the past few days and in recent times - that English players should play for the national side. There's obviously a clear fucking difference between Wilfried Zaha, who moved to England when he was four years old and has spent the majority of his life in England, and Adnan Januzaj, a Belgian-born kid of Albanian and Kosovan heritage who has lived in England for two years. Janujaz, clearly, can in no way be interpreted as English, whereas the likes of Zaha and Sterling, who have lived in this country for the majority of their lives, clearly can.

You're just deciding to be outraged because it's Wilshere. What he is saying has been said by so many people before. There have been debates before about Mikel Arteta and Manuel Almunia potentially playing for England - are the people who said they shouldn't be chosen, because they're clearly fucking Spanish, xenophobic as well? Obviously not.

Pathetic.


My what?

I've been a pretty consistent defender of Wilshere on here. In fact, I don't think I've ever said a bad word against him.

Odd one to talk about biases though, seeing as mostly everyone thinks Wilshere's been a bit out of order but you're first to the defence of him. Not because you're an Arsenal fan, of course.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
My what?

I've been a pretty consistent defender of Wilshere on here. In fact, I don't think I've ever said a bad word against him.

Odd one to talk about biases though, seeing as mostly everyone thinks Wilshere's been a bit out of order but you're first to the defence of him. Not because you're an Arsenal fan, of course.

You called him a cretin. That probably constitutes as a 'bad word' against him.

Also, why have you completely ignored every one of my points?

Like all fans, I'm slightly biased towards my own team, but in this instance the entire thing has been blown way out of proportion and his comments completely twisted and taken out of context. You've mentioned Stirling and Zaha, neither of whom were born in this country, but not once did Wilshere say you had to be born here to be English. It's fucking ridiculous and I'm more inclined to defend him because so many people are criticizing him and having a go at him for things he hasn't even said.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
Actually, seeing as people are so quick to criticize despite not knowing actually what's been said, here are his exact words;

No, for me if you are English you are English and you play for England. The only people who should play for England are English people. If you live in England for five years it doesn’t make you English. You shouldn’t play ... it doesn’t mean you can play for a country. If I went to Spain and lived there for five years I am not going to play for Spain.

At no point does Wilshere make the point that you have to be born here to be English. In fact, he doesn't even go into detail about what being English is, but rather just says by living in a country for five years (like Januzaj would have to do). doesn't make you English - because it clearly doesn't. He's made the point that someone like Januzaj, Arteta, Almunia, or whoever - who clearly isn't English in any way - should not play for the English national side.

If almost any other player had said what he's said, it wouldn't even be a fucking story. He's just a popular hate figure at the moment. It's funny how people always go on about footballers not offering real opinions, but when they do, they're criticized and slagged off by the masses. No fucking wonder they stick to boring responses the entire time.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
You called him a cretin. That probably constitutes as a 'bad word' against him.

Also, why have you completely ignored every one of my points?

Like all fans, I'm slightly biased towards my own team, but in this instance the entire thing has been blown way out of proportion and his comments completely twisted and taken out of context. You've mentioned Stirling and Zaha, neither of whom were born in this country, but not once did Wilshere say you had to be born here to be English. It's fucking ridiculous and I'm more inclined to defend him because so many people are criticizing him and having a go at him for things he hasn't even said.


Because plenty of other people have taken the debate up. The problem people have is 'England for the English', its rhetoric thats painfully close to EDL crap. Seeing as Wilshere hasn't defined what makes you 'English' I think it's perfectly fair to talk about the amount of foreign born players that play sport for the country.

And everyone is taking Wilshere's comments that way, apart from you, which is why he's taking flack from all quarters.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
Because plenty of other people have taken the debate up. The problem people have is 'England for the English', its rhetoric thats painfully close to EDL crap. Seeing as Wilshere hasn't defined what makes you 'English' I think it's perfectly fair to talk about the amount of foreign born players that play sport for the country.

And everyone is taking Wilshere's comments that way, apart from you, which is why he's taking flack from all quarters.

There's plenty of people defending him, Gary Lineker being the most high-profile example. If you read through Twitter, Reddit etc there are plenty of people defending him, as are there people calling him a racist, a xenophobe or a nationalist.

As I said before, it's all out of context. He's clearly making a point that foreigners - as in players that have no clear links to England - shouldn't represent England. It's far more fun to ignore what's actually been said, however, and assume he hates Mo Farah, Kevin Pietersen and all of his English teammates who weren't born here. It's a perfect storm of a currently unpopular player voicing an opinion that has been twisted and manipulated to fit a certain narrative.

I've said all I've needed to say, anyway. I'm just repeating myself and you're ignoring the points I made in earlier posts.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
And, for the record, if he had said that people who weren't born in England aren't English, then I'd completely agree with the outrage. What bugs me is that he hasn't said that, and was clearly referencing foreign players who cannot be seen as English in any logical way, and that people are slating him as if he said that he doesn't want to play alongside the likes of Zaha and Stirling.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
'England National team for the English!'

What a Nazi.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
'England National team for the English!'

What a Nazi.

Exactly. Those who opposed the appointments of Sven and Capello are fascists as well.
Obtuse
15 years ago
3 years ago
1,338
Callum, you are wrong in this and his stupidity (that is all it is really as he is thick) was shown up during an exchange with Kevin Pieterson on Twitter about it.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
Callum, you are wrong in this and his stupidity (that is all it is really as he is thick) was shown up during an exchange with Kevin Pieterson on Twitter about it.

He's a bit thick and didn't exactly cover himself in glory with his Twitter comments, but everything I've said about his original statement I stick by. Pietersen spoke to him as if Wilshere had said those not born in England aren't English, which he hadn't. He's gotten involved in the media furore, decided to be offended when it's obvious that Wilshere wasn't saying something that would mean he wouldn't approve of Zaha, Stirling etc playing for England.

Anyway, I'm sick of fucking talking about it because I'm clearly fighting a losing battle. People have made up their minds about him without actually reading what he's said and applied some logic and context to the situation. If it was someone like Alex Ferguson or Arsene Wenger saying that Englishmen should play for the national side and not foreigners, there would be little to no uproar whatsoever. That's what does my nut in.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Anyway, I'm sick of fucking talking about it because I'm clearly fighting a losing battle. People have made up their minds about him without actually reading what he's said and applied some logic and context to the situation. If it was someone like Alex Ferguson or Arsene Wenger saying that Englishmen should play for the national side and not foreigners, there would be little to no uproar whatsoever. That's what does my nut in.


I don't think thats true and I'm not sure why you've taken it as a personal attack on Wilshere.

People just don't like it because by implication of what he said he has come across a bit ignorant and a lot of people are uncomfortable with where that line of logic ends up.

That would be true of anyone.

You'll need to Login to comment